SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
21126wonder if high enough for major sell off?John Carragher-1/11/2003
21125A lot of volume today. <b>110,988,900</b>. The last time we had thAnonymous-1/11/2003
21124Yep, I hope they use their heads and vote against the RS! Although, by knockingDolfan-1/7/2003
21123Looks like we are headed to the mid 2's in 30-40 days. Just looking at the Jim Roof-1/7/2003
21122i was merely stating a fact. it also applies to yesterday's action. if everyhdl-1/7/2003
21121Yeah, sure!elmatador-1/6/2003
21120You are Sylvester80? Look what I wrote about MONI. Go back read it and then compelmatador-1/6/2003
21119I'd add Elmo to that list... I see according to Dell’Oro, Lucent regained tDavid Hansen-1/6/2003
21118Elmo. You are very poor at reading and then giving a cognitive reply... What youDavid Hansen-1/6/2003
21117Personally ... I do believe that <b>Mr.Fun</b> did have another accoAnonymous-1/2/2003
21116if every day lu does as well %wise as it did today, it will be back at $80 soonehdl-1/2/2003
21115Anonymous, <i>I guess one could say that Mr.Fun banished himself.</i&gDave-1/1/2003
21114<b>Mr.Fun</b> has not made a post on Silicon Investor since his lastAnonymous-1/1/2003
21113Actually LU and Agere are doing better than NT. NT did not spin off their microesylvester80-12/31/2002
21112Hi Sylvester! I notice NT doing better than LU - just like I predicted.Kenneth E. Phillipps-12/31/2002
21111You must be a 2 year old with absolutely no reading comprehension. I suggest yousylvester80-12/31/2002
21110Do you guys remember sylvester80? He put his tail between his legs and is now poelmatador-12/31/2002
21109Gotta shoot people to get buying opportunity?? Got to bomb a whole country to crelmatador-12/30/2002
21108Have a <b><i>HAPPY NEW YEAR</b></i> and consider the facAnonymous-12/30/2002
21107<b><i>M.E.R.R.Y C.H.R.I.S.T.M.A.S. EVERYONE!</b></i>Anonymous-12/24/2002
21106Well it looks like we will close above the 1.50 by years end and maybe over 2 byIsland Man-12/23/2002
21105Yes, I think they'd take $10m for LU right about now. Happy Holidays!Kevin Rose-12/23/2002
21104<i>What does this bozo define as 'up for sale'? </i> My houMarc Hyman-12/23/2002
21103So, are corporate officers responsible for their actions, or simply the minion oKevin Rose-12/21/2002
21102Kevin, RE: <i> What does this bozo define as 'up for sale'? You GVTucker-12/21/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):