SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Orbital science (ORB)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2394 35 0 ORB
Emcee:  Yanan Mou Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2119 <i>I think that the bump in price today was mostly the reaction to the OrGerald Walls-4/1/1999
2118 Mark, I am still following the stock. I think that the bump in price today waRP Svoboda-3/31/1999
2117 Thread Anyone following this stock? Pretty impressive move in the last week. wiz-3/31/1999
2116 Law suits are seldom in the best interests of shareholders. The thing that I haRichaaard-3/17/1999
2115 Thanks Tom --I've copied it and I'm impressed. IMO, under the scrutinyFred Levine-3/17/1999
2114 Today Orb learn to speak: On their web site: orbital.com and read ORBITAL ANTomHighsmith-3/17/1999
2113 in the usa people can sue for any reason, in the case of ORB, some one is pissejeff lipschutz-3/17/1999
2112 I do not believe that any of the lawyers or law firms bringing these class actiLester e.-3/16/1999
2111 I agree, restatement has nothing to do with guilt. This guy is either a moron oRichaaard-3/16/1999
2110 As much as I agree with some of your views on the lawsuit, your inclusion of anRichaaard-3/16/1999
2109 It now seems that there are more scavengers and bottom scroungers than shareholFred Levine-3/16/1999
2108 All of these sharks are jumping in to get a slice of the pie. (legal fees} TheLester e.-3/16/1999
2107 Even more significant is all his posts concern suits by the same law firm. The Barronio-3/15/1999
2106 <i>This case is strictly a restatement case, which means the company has dwight martin-3/15/1999
2105 Are you affiliated with any securities class action suits in any way? I find iFJB-3/15/1999
2104 The result of the suit will probably benefit the shareholders. This case is strbdave1-3/15/1999
2103 What are the possible outcomes of these lawsuits for ORB? If insider trading tradman33-3/15/1999
2102 How can you all bash these lawyers who are fighting for our rights as shareholdbdave1-3/15/1999
2101 Hi there. This is pretty interest: fool.comTim-3/12/1999
2100 I was going to publish a condensed listing of the Lawyers' Hall of Shame, bdwight martin-3/12/1999
2099 You style yourself simultaneously as (1) a "victim" of the companydwight martin-3/12/1999
2098 What good does that do us if we get sued for $250 million not covered by insurjim black-3/12/1999
2097 We're now selling at 1X sales = bottom? Robert Scott-3/12/1999
2096 I doubt that there is any kind of insurance for this kind of exposure. If proveRichaaard-3/11/1999
2095 As a victim of the company's alleged misinformation, my concern is that theFred Levine-3/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):