SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
21251I think LU is technically strong right now. Let's face it, the true market Jim Roof-5/6/2003
21250Ease your mind Anon. The highest purchase price for me was $68 back in March ofAlex Chilton-5/6/2003
21249I need a lot of support. I'm holding some of this puppy that I bought over Anonymous-5/6/2003
21248I think once solidly above 2.00 LU should find support right about that level. Jim Roof-5/5/2003
21247Juniper Network's announcement also helped Nortel which was up as much as 17Anonymous-5/5/2003
21246>Certainly can't be because of what was mentioned in the previous post YeDiB-5/5/2003
21245What's the news? Why the POP in price? Certainly can't be because of wAnonymous-5/5/2003
21244By Ben Charny Staff Writer, CNET News.com May 5, 2003, 10:15 AM PT Lucent TechDHB-5/5/2003
21243if lu breaks thru $2, it may be on its wayhdl-5/3/2003
21242Big operators cut spending 19%. According to the The Wall Street Journal, investelmatador-4/29/2003
21241The one reverse split that I have first hand knowledge about is the one done by Anonymous-4/29/2003
21240Regarding LUCENT's 30 day moving average. Wed (9/18/02) Close $0.94 .... 30Anonymous-4/29/2003
21239I believe there was a period of time it was trading under a $1. it was not long John Carragher-4/29/2003
21238I recall that the NYSE had relaxed delisting regulations in the wake of 9/11. IJim Roof-4/29/2003
21237John, thanks. I had call into investor relations and they called back. AuthoriAllen Furlan-4/29/2003
21236from memory it was approved to reverse split but no amount or time. open.... IJohn Carragher-4/29/2003
21235John, has the board ever set the ratio for the split or announced any definite tAllen Furlan-4/29/2003
21234no difference. I knew a few ceo's that didn't believe in stock splits bJohn Carragher-4/29/2003
21233ERICY is doing pretty well today despite its "reverse split" about a yElroy-4/29/2003
21232John, Please cite an example of when a reverse split has been beneficial to sharJohn Dunigan-4/29/2003
21231George I copied a quote from previous message and added I agree. I do not belieJohn Carragher-4/26/2003
21230Agree with that, but you sounded like that would mean "belly-up" for tGeorge Coyne-4/26/2003
21229stock split has nothing todo with business prospects. It is only an accounting John Carragher-4/26/2003
21228Are you suggesting that that would hurt their business prospects, however dim orGeorge Coyne-4/26/2003
21227"A stock split will be the death of LU IMO." imo too.John Carragher-4/24/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News