SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR)
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3386 84 0 XMSR
Emcee:  HiSpeed Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2136>> XMSR appears to be a good short subject. What do you think? I don'i-node-2/1/2006
2135Frontmed- XMSR appears to be a good short subject. What do you think? stockconHEXonX-2/1/2006
2134Wachovia downgrades XM Satellite (XMSR 27.47) to Mkt Perform from Outperform as sixty2nds-1/30/2006
2133>>XM has done an excellent job of controlling content costs No kidding, XSirius_Rich-1/28/2006
2132<I>The investors drink the Kool-Aid and say things like. Low, Low cost of i-node-1/28/2006
2131<i> I will say that the only real exception to date has been the $650 Millpcstel-1/27/2006
213009:08 XMSR XM Satellite started with an Accumulate at Janco; tgt $36 (27.22 ) sixty2nds-1/24/2006
2129It is different in a couple of ways- a) The quality is much higher and the sizePostman-1/23/2006
2128Got it - how is it different from the Itunes or Napster (legal version) and otherrufff-1/23/2006
2127(((How do they make money? Music seems to be a commodity item now unless you havPostman-1/23/2006
2126How do they make money? Music seems to be a commodity item now unless you have rrufff-1/23/2006
2125Anyone interested in a penny in the arena- MCT.V delivers music to radio stationPostman-1/23/2006
2124Is that the best you can do? You said "the entire deal" in your pitifrrufff-1/23/2006
2123FrontMed, how that changing your handle didn't seem to help your feeble arguHEXonX-1/23/2006
2122>>> Of course - it's alread there in 2 weeks - actually even beforei-node-1/23/2006
2121Here you are in an admission, and perhaps your only really attempt at obectivityrrufff-1/23/2006
2120Another pitiful post. Message 20624834 <i> So, fair value, as of now? I wrrufff-1/23/2006
2119Here's a beauty from you. <i>But I continue to believe that SIRI has rrufff-1/23/2006
2118<i>No way. SIRI will be lucky to get 2M over the term of the deal.</i&grrufff-1/23/2006
2117In October 2004, you posted your prediction for numbers. It's pitiful and, orrufff-1/23/2006
2116You want proof of your own pitiful posts? In case you didn't see Sirius Richrrufff-1/23/2006
2115You're FOS. If you have the posts, link them. If you don't, you shouldi-node-1/22/2006
2114Just go back and see all the posts of YOURS I dug up where you said that SIRI wrrufff-1/22/2006
2113>>Immediately after Stern was signed, the stock shot up to 8 or 9 How sooSirius_Rich-1/22/2006
2112<I>He's been dead wrong on SIRI, whether viewed vs XMSR, or in generali-node-1/22/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):