SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
WARNING- have you been warned by SI? Let's talk
An SI Board Since March 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1614 8 0
Emcee:  epicure Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
214 Grammatically, should that not be "...care more"? anPatrick Slevin-3/8/1998
213 Bill-I was impressed by your ideas, probably because my husband, (a lawyer) andRambi-3/8/1998
212 This is the E-mail I received from Jill last week. > From: Jill > To: James R. Barrett-3/8/1998
211 Marcos, Enjoyed reminiscing about "Don't fence me in". It used tJack Clarke-3/8/1998
210 bill. i think it a fine idea and i encourage its official submission... i woulflickerful-3/8/1998
209 marcos..... it would be impossible to track down and digest all possibly relevflickerful-3/8/1998
208 Thanks, and I agree with you on your assessment. I think that since this threaMitch Blevins-3/8/1998
207 anybody know when's earnings? ;-) <gg> A friend mentioned you were iBill Ulrich-3/8/1998
206 He had some 'facts' wrong, imho - for instance, around that time he stamarcos-3/8/1998
205 marcos - help me out here.... by "wrong", you mean that he had some Mitch Blevins-3/8/1998
204 We could maybe remember that rrman started LST up with (I think) this post; 207marcos-3/8/1998
203 >>could be worse though. Could be a technical analysis thread<< fuMitch Blevins-3/8/1998
202 Pete - re: the "SHUT UP" post. More to that one than meets the eye. Mitch Blevins-3/8/1998
201 Well thanks for the welcome, unfortunately I'm not staying... I'm afraiWilliam Nelson-3/8/1998
200 I find your post devoid any ideas that I can address. - except maybe one - I hmarcos-3/8/1998
199 Nemoepicure-3/8/1998
198 Rotten Tomato's ??? <Graystone-3/8/1998
197 Connotation <b&gGraystone-3/8/1998
196 Regardless of whatGraystone-3/8/1998
195 Don't Fence Me In Oh, give me bandwidth, lots of bandwidth under starry skmarcos-3/8/1998
194 Humbly report, All, regarding <i>Janice (for as long as she lasts on SI),Josef Svejk-3/8/1998
193 Dear William, Thank you so much for visiting the WARNING thread. Let me be theepicure-3/8/1998
192 I for one love the fact that SI is moderated... for those who like minimial sigWilliam Nelson-3/8/1998
191 Taht has been the acceptable form of "that" since the Igfestation on epicure-3/8/1998
190 No, 'taht' is not Freedom, 'taht' is License - and you, madam, marcos-3/7/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):