SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4467 83 0 SFE
Emcee:  Mark Sagarin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2167 John, That is one belief we are in total agreement . Your example illustrates michael r potter-1/13/1999
2166 michael, I'm not shorting anything, but I guess I would be in the "shaJohn Arnopp-1/13/1999
2165 Will SFE trade again [soon] at around $25, which would be something like a 10% michael r potter-1/13/1999
2164 Hummmmmmm. They liked (bought) USDC at $5+, but not at $2.David Lawrence-1/13/1999
2163 SFE's ownership numbers as of 12/31/98 are now up at the SFE web site. safWilliam R. Polk-1/13/1999
2162 John, In the news release this morning they seemed to separate ICG and US Interobert miller-1/12/1999
2161 Good trading to you, too, Fred. At least I'm not alone: <i>Tuesday John Arnopp-1/12/1999
2160 John, Thanks for your sensible post. They will all go down and up than down, Frederick Langford-1/12/1999
2159 <i>My friend, this is the future...</i> Yes, it is. I never want John Arnopp-1/12/1999
2158 >> NM doesn't mean SFE should try to pump up price on silly InternetFrederick Langford-1/12/1999
2157 Except that the <b>PE is NOT 16, but really north of 45.</b> If yoJohn Arnopp-1/12/1999
2156 I believe this is one of the most underfollowed, undervalued equity out there. Frederick Langford-1/12/1999
2155 Warning: This will be long and rambling. I feel a kinship with Safeguard, becJohn Arnopp-1/12/1999
2154biz.yahoo.comOliver Pepper-1/12/1999
2153 Trouble with most calls that people buy [at or out of the money] is that if themichael r potter-1/11/1999
2152 Never ever made money consistently on options.Professionals in the field that ipuborectalis-1/10/1999
2151 Does anyone feel optimistic enough about SFE to buy options? I want to add to seaweed-1/10/1999
2150 John, SFE is still doing a little shopping. In Dec. they bought 57,400 sharesrobert miller-1/9/1999
2149 John, I wouldn't call Who?Vision a pure play. They seem to be more of a robert miller-1/9/1999
2148 bob, 1) Would Who? Vision count as a "pure play" Internet in your boJohn Arnopp-1/8/1999
2147 Questions For All, Which company will be the first pure play internet rights orobert miller-1/8/1999
2146 Dave,do NOT short SFE..technically very strong with a move into the forties a gpuborectalis-1/8/1999
2145 The speculative mania going on has seemingly shattered a couple of Wall Street michael r potter-1/8/1999
2144 Yeah, I've got an opinion about that, John. <VBG> My opinion is thatDavid Lawrence-1/8/1999
2143 How can you trust MM's opinion when he's recommended ROSS for years?! puborectalis-1/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News