SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2484 45 0 LUMM
Emcee:  Currency Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2184Pat, you are as far from the 'average Joe' as I can imagine. And the &#Don Johnstone-2/25/2001
2183<i>he who laughs last</i> I'm not laughing. And the minute thepat mudge-2/25/2001
2182<i>And as to the Molex 'problem'. IMHO the problem is that the teapat mudge-2/25/2001
2181Pat, you still follow the trials and tribulations of LUMM. Why? A good short? ItDon Johnstone-2/25/2001
2180he who laughs last.... eomtogrok-2/25/2001
2179A comparison of what the article says and what Lumenon is actually doing: The apat mudge-2/25/2001
2178Article on LUMM : msnbc.comtogrok-2/24/2001
2177Lumenon Manufacturing Facility is Operational; Company Ships First Customer OrdeRon Schier-2/15/2001
2176Somehow they describe themselves as "a manufacturer of high-quality opticalFred McCutcheon-2/14/2001
2175Yup. Soooooo.....having tracked Castle for a bit of time it's apparent partJohn Curtis-1/30/2001
2174This stock is range bound as we expected after the financing from Castle Creek. P. Ramamoorthy-1/29/2001
2173Here's the Molex arrangement... <<Agreements with Molex On May 19 andHerc-1/22/2001
2172Pat Why are they in discussions with 30 other companies if they have an exclusivMike Hardy-1/22/2001
2171Yes, I am familiar with the strategic agreement with Molex, which I think enhancTickertype-1/22/2001
2170<i>. I expect to see more of them in the coming days and weeks. We'll pat mudge-1/21/2001
2169Yes, it is of course standard procedure for an OEM to procure samples of new comTickertype-1/19/2001
2168I only hope the sheeple out there read this PR and buy this reverse-merger POS, jjs64-1/18/2001
2167<i>Familiar pattern?</i> Oh....I can think of at least one other eqJohn Curtis-1/18/2001
2166John, Here is a purchase order! Familiar pattern? OEM order, no quantity, etc.P. Ramamoorthy-1/18/2001
2165John, Yeah, watching LUMM and made a few risky trades. In 8-9 when they went toP. Ramamoorthy-1/16/2001
2164Part of the drop is from the market, but a lot of credit for it must be given toFred McCutcheon-1/15/2001
2163It seems so. Mitel has alot of money and a proven track record so competition wGus Cusimano-1/15/2001
2162Mitel has created another player in the game. It is not clear exactly where theFred McCutcheon-1/15/2001
2161Ram: <i>Sound familiar? </i> LOL! Very familiar! Hmmmm...I'vJohn Curtis-1/13/2001
2160John, As expected, Castle Creek and partners went for a partial conversion at P. Ramamoorthy-1/12/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):