SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
MEDX ... anybody following?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2240 62 0 MEDX
Emcee:  Ed Offstein Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2190btw.... >> What measures do I use for productivity? << I made it cscaram(o)uche26/25/2009
2189>> Did you do the search on Lowe's career before publicly questioning scaram(o)uche26/25/2009
2188Fair points, but OTOH, there is the quote: "I had never seen anything like nigel bates-6/25/2009
2187>>if you can't do science, write about it<< I don't think Dtuck16/25/2009
2186A lot of news about this already. But I think this is worth a read by anyone inkenhott16/24/2009
2185>> The PR is hype -- possibly justified, but too soon to say -- without thscaram(o)uche26/24/2009
2184>> We all have to be critical in the investment world << Same thougscaram(o)uche-6/24/2009
2183(duplicate post, sorry)scaram(o)uche-6/24/2009
2182Fine. Lowe is underqualified blowhard. But if I had said what he said -- and htuck26/24/2009
2181Here's an idea, Tuck. Since you contribute, on occasion, to his web page? scaram(o)uche-6/23/2009
2180I did not say that Lowe's analysis of medx was a cheap shot. But you are coscaram(o)uche-6/23/2009
2179Yeah, but your Mom doesn't have the prostate problems I may have!tom pope-6/23/2009
2178Well, the skepticism is based on lack of detail about the trial. The number of tuck-6/23/2009
2177I hope he's wrong in his skepticism. My PSA has been rising from comfortabltom pope-6/23/2009
2176Wow, it's only two patients! Wow, it wasn't MAb alone! These are insigscaram(o)uche-6/23/2009
2175Derek Lowe, noting the PR lacks certain key details, throws some cold water on ttuck-6/23/2009
2174Now THAT'S what a tumor immunologist expects. CTLs could eat into Fort Knoxscaram(o)uche-6/21/2009
2173I hadn't noticed the volume on Friday. Monday may be interesting. [graphic]tom pope-6/20/2009
2172I'll third or fourth that! Erik, you're a constant source of pertinent A.J. Mullen-6/20/2009
2171I'd like to add my thanks to yours.tom pope-6/20/2009
2170Promising. Thanks, Erik.nigel bates-6/20/2009
2169Cancer: shock breakthrough independent.co.uk BBC: 'Surprise' prostate Icebrg-6/20/2009
2168Makes it all worthwhile. Thanks Icebrg for your constant diligence and sharing.biofisher26/19/2009
2167Prostate Cancer: From Inoperable to Cancer Free discoverysedge.mayo.edu I likeIcebrg26/19/2009
2166Mayo reports dramatic outcomes in prostate cancer study By Susan Perry | PublishIcebrg-6/19/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):