SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2190Officer and director liability insurance will get involved with any court judgemtelephonics-3/11/2002
2189You are completely wrong. Although I have little faith in class action suits bentelephonics-3/11/2002
2188Both points are valid. Lawsuits will not go away as many people were damaged by613-3/11/2002
2187LOL..can you pass the joint please? <<gg>> TraderXxTraderXx-3/10/2002
2186Leak is irrelevant, damage done, whoever did it (and Imcl and Bmy insiders more Cacaito-3/10/2002
2185The law suits will take million$ out of Imcl, and shareholders. Not that will deCacaito-3/10/2002
2184Keep dreaming upon. Imcl has more chances of being history !Cacaito-3/10/2002
2183They will be abandoned or dismissed more quickly than that... The courts have nThe Fox-3/9/2002
2182The law suits will take years to wend their way through our distored legal systetelephonics-3/9/2002
2181The IMCL lawsuits soon will be history... And so, too, the lawyers that instigaThe Fox-3/9/2002
2180"Class action suits are to stay, the settlement probably will be juicy dozeTraderXx-3/7/2002
2179Quite strange, the cocaine, bad checks, fancy datings and other lifestyles issueCacaito-3/7/2002
2178Would it not be a classic turn of events, if IMCL could now be the catalyst for Arthur Radley-3/6/2002
2177From the WSJ article, the original 39% was to move up as more uses were approved613-3/6/2002
2176Cacaito, I have a different understanding (I may have this wrong) of royalty coIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-3/6/2002
2175IRW, previous agreement was an "scale up" according to revenues/gross Cacaito-3/6/2002
2174Lawyers - the only profession who's job is to save you from others in the sa613-3/6/2002
2173Cacaito, I thought there was a deal to be done. Now we see it. The parties wiIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-3/6/2002
2172IRJ, you were "more" right, I was "almost" right, but the leCacaito-3/5/2002
2171ImClone Systems and Bristol-Myers Squibb Announce Revised Terms of CommercializaArthur Radley-3/5/2002
2170Interesting, to say the least... ImClone Systems and Bristol-Myers Squibb Announigel bates-3/5/2002
2169Those comments attributed to Ica^n if true would make me wonder if it is just lukeokalani'nui-3/4/2002
2168Icahn reported: ""less interested,has concerns that the drug may take Cacaito-3/4/2002
2167"I find the shares to be uninvestable, It's gambling to me.''&qCacaito-3/4/2002
2166Thomas Weisels and Partners: too much risk, uncertain stock, better options someCacaito-3/4/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News