SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2193Bad idea, to volunteer any information that doesn't simply and directly answJon Tara-7/24/2003
2192yup...kinda scaryJorj X Mckie-7/24/2003
2191You show me a trader scalping for 1/8's on 50-100-dollar stocks during 1998-CountofMoneyCristo-7/24/2003
2190So what is that supposed to prove? That one has the right to turn things around Yogizuna-7/24/2003
2189OK, now the double-reverse: ___________________________________________________CountofMoneyCristo-7/24/2003
2188Just stating it like I see it...Yogizuna-7/24/2003
2187>>> Let me ask you this, if you lost $10M using the advice of a serviceYogizuna-7/24/2003
2186Yes, one that would rule in favor of him without seeing the evidence.Jon Tara-7/24/2003
2185Count's review of his trading performance: "DAMMMMMMM that shoeboxJon Tara-7/24/2003
2184I have no reason to assume that. I don't know you from Adam, and have no reaJon Tara-7/24/2003
2183sounds like you are the perfect juror for the plaintiffJorj X Mckie-7/24/2003
2182>>> The point is, from statements that he has made on this thread, he oYogizuna-7/24/2003
2181I do not see how anyone could be critical of efforts made to "clean up the Yogizuna-7/24/2003
2180considering the number of questions that you have not answered, I don't feelJorj X Mckie-7/24/2003
2179I do not have the time to engage in a "point by point" debate with youYogizuna-7/24/2003
2178Hey Count ... why'd you ignore this post? Too much truth in it? Message 191Dave O.-7/24/2003
2177What is the meaning of "to be" Jorj? You have yet to answer. You'CountofMoneyCristo-7/24/2003
2176Ok, let's try that the other way round: ___________________________________CountofMoneyCristo-7/24/2003
2175what matters is the legal definition of "advice" or "opinion"Jorj X Mckie-7/24/2003
2174<i>Let's do a little courtroom drama:</i> LOL! OK, now I'lCountofMoneyCristo-7/24/2003
2173<i>to me...picks = opinions based on subjective interpretation of technicaCountofMoneyCristo-7/24/2003
2172Let's do a little courtroom drama: COMC <i>If you pay someone for advJorj X Mckie-7/24/2003
2171< They taught scalping multiple trades for peanuts because it generated huge Dave O.-7/24/2003
2170this is where I think you need to be wary of your definitions. stocks = securitJorj X Mckie-7/24/2003
2169Like I said, if Rea commits perjury again, this time before the Court of Appeal,CountofMoneyCristo-7/24/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News