SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Columbia Capital Corporation-Computerized Banking (CLCK)
An SI Board Since May 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1020 5 0 CLCK
Emcee:  Jeffrey L. Henken Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
220 Jeff: Neither of those two issues bother me too much and I believe the stock wgreg Benfield-6/2/1998
219 Greg says: >I am very optimistic..but I do worry about two things< <bJeffrey L. Henken-6/2/1998
218 Some great insight from you gentleman! The earning potential for this Co is incJames Marks-6/1/1998
217 I am very optimistic..but I do worry about two things 1. Lack of float. A smgreg Benfield-6/1/1998
216 In other words, we have a lot to look forward to!!! Dan Dan Dieffenwierth-6/1/1998
215 Greg, You are right! When looking at the potential, we can conservatively basTensane 1-6/1/1998
214 Okay..this is getting more difficult I say too little and I get roasted...othergreg Benfield-6/1/1998
213 greg-- Continue to post your messages in this manner and you may get yet anothMel Viticus-6/1/1998
212 Next Acquistion. Lets suppose next acquisition adds large amount to bottom linehdrider-6/1/1998
211 Okay I am going to try an calm this guy's fears without getting myself in tgreg Benfield-5/31/1998
210 I just want to point out in the last press release it does say Nasdaq BB at thegreg Benfield-5/31/1998
209 how do I access my private messages? greg Benfield-5/31/1998
208 Why don't you Biffpincus and Ed roofguy GO JUMP OFF THE ROOF! what is yourJames Marks-5/31/1998
207 OT-Whatever...When TM wants to come himself then we will discuss CLCK and not bJeffrey L. Henken-5/31/1998
206 I know this will stir up a hornet's nest, but, please remember I'm postbiffpincus-5/31/1998
205 <b><i> I think they are just being conservative.</b></i>Jeffrey L. Henken-5/30/1998
204 Jeff, Thanks for the answer...I don't know either. But thanks for respondigreg Benfield-5/30/1998
203 Evidence that Prices do not Fully Reflect the Implications of Current Earnings Jeffrey L. Henken-5/30/1998
202 anyone...anyone...please? greg Benfield-5/30/1998
201 Will someone please answer my numbers dilemma? Jeff, Kevin, Jim, Brenda....anygreg Benfield-5/30/1998
200 Dan one thing that people seem to be underestimating about this industry is thaJeffrey L. Henken-5/30/1998
199 I think it's time to revisit the Y2K compliance issue and how it will effecJeffrey L. Henken-5/30/1998
198 Off Topic-Kind of a dead thread TLC...Lets talk about CLCK here in the future. Jeffrey L. Henken-5/30/1998
197 OK, you insist. I like HDs, I've owned a few, so I'll be civil. If yoDon Pueblo-5/30/1998
196 "The" Chicken and I will cover all virtual bets. PhilPhil(bullrider)-5/30/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News