Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit

An SI Board Since June 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
3143	54	0

Emcee: CountofMoneyCristo	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2218	And BP made some insults today after saying I was losing it yesterday. Here'	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2217	>>> Your encouraging words can lift someone up and help him or her make	Yogizuna	-	7/24/2003
2216	Maybe I'll sue you for a case of Pepsi ;-). Both sides are important to hea	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2215	well, here is some real advice, if you think that yogi's position will help	Jorj X Mckie	-	7/24/2003
2214	I learned that with my former attorneys. It was very disappointing, to say the	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2213	Jorj is right about being prepared, but Yogi's points are on topic, because	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2212	That's an absurd argument. Read the log. That doesn't sound like analy	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2211	<i>Like I have said, if the Count can prove that the picks were made and b	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2210	>>> As an aside, you said earlier I thought I had legal prowess. Well,	Yogizuna	-	7/24/2003
2209	because the people who are challenging COMC, instead of blowing sunshine up his	Jorj X Mckie	-	7/24/2003
2208	This is not the stand, nor a courtroom. Your statement is intensely obtuse, ami	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2207	In fact, most advisory services do NOT recommend that you put on every trade tha	Jon Tara	-	7/24/2003
2206	Message 19143400 You know, in this post I addressed what some people here have	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2205	>>> The one thing that you can assume is that anybody who has challenge	Yogizuna	-	7/24/2003
2204	<i>Please tell us all you critics out there, how would you know which trad	TheStockStalker	-	7/24/2003
2203	I would like to know the answer to that question also... Please tell us all you	Yogizuna	-	7/24/2003
2202	Another demonstration of your paranoia. I wasn't trying to get you to comme	Jon Tara	-	7/24/2003
2201	Goes to reliance. Why did we go to sites? Why trust them? Why pay them? Why	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2200	Some laws are not open to very much interpretation. Some are. Good point thoug	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2199	That's interesting, but of course I'm not going to debate with you what	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2198	>>> he is talking about the fact that once you have money on the table,	Yogizuna	-	7/24/2003
2197	the issue is that you have not shown that there is any real evidence to support	Jorj X Mckie	-	7/24/2003
2196	I think your attorney will find you a pain in the butt who can't follow inst	Jon Tara	-	7/24/2003
2195	That's a strange remark coming from two guys who have argued that stock pick	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003
2194	<i>And I'll bet you WILL run off at the mouth in a real court room. &l	CountofMoneyCristo	-	7/24/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):