SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM)
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2891 47 0 FCM
Emcee:  Seth L. Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2241 <i>Isn't it easier this way ???</i> Yes, as long as we focus oDavid Colvin-10/1/1999
2240 Yes, you are correct, that it does <b>not</b> say that. However if Noneyet-10/1/1999
2239 Who cares....the fact is they installed it for a very good reason known to FCM/David Colvin-10/1/1999
2238 Are you suggesting that GTE installed the new OC-48 line for free ? It does staNoneyet-10/1/1999
2237 Ron, Thanks for that "heads up" on FCM's latest news release todDavid Colvin-10/1/1999
2236 (PR Wires) PRW: Franklin Telecom Installs OC-48 Expansion; Meets Need f Ron Herring-10/1/1999
2235 Lew, Right now I don't really care. As I said in a previous post: Hint: David Colvin-10/1/1999
2234 DC. Thanks for the link on the NR. I got real excited for a few minutes....thouLowtherAcademy-10/1/1999
2233 Charles, I have my doubts about usat, aside from the issues I have raised numeNoneyet-10/1/1999
2232 With only 23 trades in USAT so far (my source is 20 minute delayed) it would seDavid Colvin-10/1/1999
2231 Charles, A resounding YES is the answer to your question, you have also added Noneyet-10/1/1999
2230 I owe all longs an apology of sorts...up to now I took the line that FCM had noCharles Broderick-10/1/1999
2229 Have I not Thomas??? See my last post and answer "yes!!!!"Charles Broderick-10/1/1999
2228 I have been critical of the company for not having a single order of substance Charles Broderick-10/1/1999
2227 Bruce, How do you like these apples! newsalert.com To the FCM bashers, read David Colvin-10/1/1999
2226 First off my opinion of why you will not answer any questions of mine regardingNoneyet-10/1/1999
2225 Same old blah, blah, blah. Like I said, I only discuss my holdings with REAL stBruce Hoyt-10/1/1999
2224 Some questions to you pertaining to the <b>Public Corporation of FranklinNoneyet-10/1/1999
2223 OK Thomas, yes my real name is Bruce Hoyt and that's what I use on SI. It wBruce Hoyt-10/1/1999
2222 Hey newboy, great name there. Yes I was at the shareholder meeting both this yeBruce Hoyt-10/1/1999
2221 Off topic to bruce hoyt and anyone else to whom this may apply; I asked you a Noneyet-10/1/1999
2220 Let us attempt to get this right one time. That is after you directly respondedNoneyet-10/1/1999
2219 Are you not the fat boy sitting in the audience on that cheap tape of shareholdlostmymoney-10/1/1999
2218 Notice how he's trying to bait joseph into an argument. He's definitelBuzzVA-9/30/1999
2217 tommyboy---There is <b><i>ABSOLUTELY NO </b></i>reason David Flood-9/30/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News