CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare

An SI Board Since September 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
3392	20	0	CYBR

Emcee: Tadsamillionaire	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2242	Barb, It would be more reasonable to assume that they start long and then go s	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2241	I suppose you assume that someone would go through the efforts of selling stock	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2240	Chris, is it possible that they could have purchased shares in the open market	StockDung	-	6/19/2000
2239	<i>"I could just as easily refer to successful FDA approval of devic	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2238	Chris is under the false impression that they will be filing 144's when the	surelock	-	6/19/2000
2237	<i>"It is beyond the scope of reason to assume that there is not suc	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2236	Barb, Actually I have looked at filed 144's - since the shares were sold wi	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2235	<i>"It seems as though Paul Bornstein did not sell any of his shares	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2234	Barb, I could just as easily refer to successful FDA approval of devices - you	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2233	<i>"- with FDA approval of the technology</i>" Please re	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2232	Barb - it's not fantasy, it's a simple equation - WHEREVER there is mon	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2231	<i>"if the SEC bust from last week is any indicator, I suspect that	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2230	Stephen, What does CYBR need FDA Level III for? It's non-invasive, non-cri	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2229	Kevin - we'll all find out together, I suppose - it's newsstuff.	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2228	Floyd, as per ZiaSun - I sincerely hope that you are vindicated - as I said, so	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2227	CYBR still needs FDA Level III, this POS goes lower, thanks for the ride up, el	Sir Auric Goldfinger	-	6/19/2000
2226	<I>the company apparently has proven</I> Well when you find out fo	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	6/19/2000
2225	"This sounds like a job for Dirks and Co." Maybe Security Capital an	StockDung	-	6/19/2000
2224	Clearly someone benefited. These just were not just two nice lads writing stron	StockDung	-	6/19/2000
2223	Floyd, It seems as though Paul Bornstein did not sell any of his shares... wha	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2222	<i>When will one reputable analyst recommend CYBR? Oh where oh where can	who cares?	-	6/19/2000
2221	Chris - the why's are that the public marketplace is full of unsophisticate	peter michaelson	-	6/19/2000
2220	Peter, from what I am to understand there is a middleman that is trying to help	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2219	Smelly buy reports by crappy analysts were CYBR's downfall. That and all th	StockDung	-	6/19/2000
2218	Kevin - the company apparently has proven that the published article from David	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):