SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
EDTA (was GIFT)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2383 14 0 EDTA
Emcee:  Mel Spivak Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2258 At least the litigation is continuing. It is dead only against this Defendant.Mel Spivak-3/21/1999
2257 Update: The New York district court docket contains the following entries. ThStang-3/19/1999
2256 Didn't the switch from GIFT to EDTA occur after 12/11/98?GRC-2/11/1999
2255 News: Friday December 11, 2:33 pm Eastern Time Company Press Release SOURCE:Mel Spivak-2/11/1999
2254 Why was the newswire info date-lined DALLAS???? Could it be that the company nocc rogers-1/30/1999
2253 Mel, Thanks for the info. E-data used to have a website but I think it is discBob Witt-1/25/1999
2252 GIFT now EDTA here's the last news I could find: Judge Denies E-Data's Mel Spivak-1/25/1999
2251 Charles, I don't have information at my fingertips right now but will do aBob Witt-1/21/1999
2250 Bob, I have searched through hundreds of posts for the company's phone numBagladdy-1/19/1999
2249 Ben, Yes, EDTA is the same stock formerly known as GIFT. It puzzles me to see Bob Witt-1/19/1999
2248 GIFT has not traded since about 12/17. Is it from no current interest ? Is itMel Spivak-1/19/1999
2247 Could you clarify? I have noticed that it doesn't seem that GIFT is no lonBen Sanford-1/19/1999
2246 Hi Mel, I check in from time to time and have found literally nothing new. IntBob Witt-1/13/1999
2245 Hi all, any news on the appeal?Mel Spivak-12/30/1998
2244 cc, Good to see your still hear. I think the only thing left with this patenGRC-12/18/1998
2243 Well, I guess YOU are left as the only one with any timely info on E-DATA. Melcc rogers-12/18/1998
2242 FYI - 3 things - new symbol, email from oppedahl, text of opinion 1) GIFT is nGRC-12/16/1998
2241 So why is this turkey even trading for 1/4? Seems like 1/64 is more like it.Rory Foster-12/15/1998
2240 FYI - Press release (below) issued by GIFT. Also, when I get an electronic cGRC-12/8/1998
2239 Charles, Are you the same Charles B. Kramer listed on the oppedahl website paGRC-12/8/1998
2238 > What is your source? I'd prefer not to say, but I suppose you could Mahatmabenfoo-12/7/1998
2237 Charles, You stated "The motion in SDNY for reconsideration was denied.&qGRC-12/7/1998
2236 > The first page was particularly compelling to me The motion in SDNY for rMahatmabenfoo-12/6/1998
2235 Wow, I was shocked to see that someone on the Wall Street Journal staff still Howard Kallman-10/9/1998
2234 Here's my take on the GIFT brief. I think it was very well-written, and coGRC-10/8/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):