SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99 | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99

An SI Board Since July 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2340	25	0

Emcee: David Lawrence	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2265	And messages <i>to</i> you? If they're not in your inbox, you c	RTev	-	10/24/1999
2264	The Outbox contains both Private message and Public messages. The public messag	RTev	-	10/24/1999
2263	I again am guessing, but try adding a word from the subject title. It may not	WTMHouston	-	10/24/1999
2262	And yet another one: In the old si I could view all messages to me by clickin	wily	-	10/24/1999
2261	>>do it by looking at the list contained on your profile<< DOH! T	wily	-	10/24/1999
2260	I would guess that you could do it by looking at the list contained on your pro	WTMHouston	-	10/24/1999
2259	To Anyone: Is there any way in the new SI to view all posts <b>from</	wily	-	10/24/1999
2258	BB I can see why M Cummings thought that ON24 was a go2net property...that ad f	levy	-	10/21/1999
2257	Now here is a vote that offers a little something for (almost} everyone. angel	WTMHouston	-	10/21/1999
2256	ok now, it was there! Which web developer is playing mind games with me. :-) A	greenspirit	-	10/20/1999
2255	Byran, on 24 is a GREAT addition to the site!! Bravo! Now THAT is thinking str	greenspirit	-	10/20/1999
2254	Bryan, here's another small ooly. Let's say you're at this field.	greenspirit	-	10/19/1999
2253	<<that's why I wouldn't use the suggested name..they wanted it to	WTMHouston	-	10/16/1999
2252	<i>"I would have waited to launch this"</i> in all serio	mr.mark	-	10/15/1999
2251	Hmmm, I think that falls under the "who would care other than SI employees	Len	-	10/15/1999
2250	Why are the hot subjects on the gnet homepage frequently different in all or pa	levy	-	10/15/1999
2249	So true... that's why I wouldn't use the suggested name..they wanted it	Len	-	10/15/1999
2248	mr mark even this gnet long found that response entertaining....I tried signing	levy	-	10/15/1999
2247	exactly, len. signed up smoothly, sent a test email, it worked, then access	mr.mark	-	10/15/1999
2246	Well, if karma was at work, then it would have gone extra smooth for me.<g&g	Len	-	10/15/1999
2245	That's odd. Perhaps there's some kind of karma at work here. I signed u	RTev	-	10/15/1999
2244	Don't <b>WE</b> know it!! Len <i>thanks for the great	Len	-	10/15/1999
2243	Their priorities appear to be on other things in recent days!	Cisco	-	10/15/1999
2242	I agree completely. It is an abortion. SI should be ashamed of themselves. I ha	Len	-	10/15/1999
2241	on a similar note... i jumped over to beta for a visit to try the new email fe	mr.mark	-	10/15/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):