CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare

An SI Board Since September 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
3392	20	0	CYBR

Emcee: Tadsamillionaire	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2267	Barb, <i>I asked why better than 99 of 100 who are charged by the SEC ar	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2266	<i>"If you want to communicate honestly, I'm prepared and always	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2265	I asked, you dodged ( more than once), no 'vagueries'. Message 1390648	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2264	Barb, semantics are games for lawyers. If you want to play with grammatical and	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2263	Barb - all you have to do is ask, and I will answer. I will be direct, I will n	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2262	You need to learn the difference between infer and imply. My statement does not	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2261	<i>I suppose you assume that someone would go through the efforts of sell	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2260	<i>"- I will be as honest and direct as I can be</i>" Su	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2259	Barb, I don't know about PLSIA. Enlighten me.	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2258	Bard - the salient question? What am I avoiding - I will be as honest and direc	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2257	Kevin - if that is so then I retract my comments as they relate to that conside	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2256	<i>"Your statement implied that they would do something illegal - ye	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2255	<i>"What I did say was simply that if the assumption of Auric was th	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2254	Barb - I'm not going ot play games here. Your statement implied that they w	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2253	Barb - my presentation in the quote you mentioned was to illustrate that CYBR i	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2252	sommivgo, you still avoid the salient question. I guess that's because it d	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2251	Actually, the two issues, of approval, and pre-approval marketing, are not as l	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	6/19/2000
2250	Barb, any one of them could be short on their respective stocks... if you'r	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2249	<i>"Your statement assumes that they have done something illegal <	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2248	sommivgo, that's sure not how you presented it. But, whatever you say...I&#	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2247	I assuming nothing - I am only looking at what is legally available to me to lo	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2246	Sure it's possible, Floyd - I suppose.	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2245	Barb - you must have missed my point regarding FDA - it was simply that the &qu	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000
2244	sec.gov is the evidence. Find me some short sellers in that list. Regards, Bar	Mama Bear	-	6/19/2000
2243	Surelock - why wouldn't they be filing 144's?	sommovigo	-	6/19/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):