SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Conolog Cp
An SI Board Since February 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
428 14 0 CNLG
Emcee:  interesting man Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
228 I can not believe I missed the tenkwizard.com AMPLIDYNE INC. I wrote a whole stStockDung-4/23/2000
227 Mike, I, too, agree it's pathetic. Although not as voluminous as ApexpicksPartyTime-4/20/2000
226 <i>How spamming con artists try and manipulate stocks on ragingbull. A peMike E.-4/20/2000
225 How spamming con artists try and manipulate stocks on ragingbull. A perfect texStockDung-4/20/2000
224 (BSNS WIRE) Conolog Anticipates 240% Increase in Annual Revenues for Fiscal Mike E.-4/17/2000
223 Truthseeker, your opportunistic shorting campaigns seem on a par level being a PartyTime-4/16/2000
222 DOGLOSER, I suggest you read the disclaimer on my web site. Anyone can give theStockDung-4/14/2000
221 rrufff--Very, very interesting. >>>There may be front running and scaPartyTime-4/14/2000
220 Nice CNBC piece.xcr600-4/14/2000
219 Hey Party, You still breathing? I bet you're ok cause like me you diversifrrufff-4/14/2000
218 Gray skies are gonna clear up, Put on a happy face; Brush off the clouds and chStockDung-4/14/2000
217 <i>Hey Mike, don't you think motive counts in the course of anyoneMike E.-4/7/2000
216 Hey Mike, don't you think motive counts in the course of anyone's due dPartyTime-4/7/2000
215 How come you don't read that as incentive to get the price up? Just becausPartyTime-4/7/2000
214 BTW, this is not compliant. It does not state how long the shares are restricteStockDung-4/7/2000
213 >>>Oh Goodie, we must take a look at this one. I hope they were objectPartyTime-4/7/2000
212 <i>"in addition to one hundred thousand restricted" "incMike E.-4/7/2000
211 "in addition to one hundred thousand restricted" "including anStockDung-4/7/2000
210 <i>Oh Goodie, we must take a look at this one. I hope they were objectiveMike E.-4/7/2000
209 Rule 701 From an article cited by the Truthseeker: Taking note of the SEC actiStockDung-4/7/2000
208 National Financial Network DISCLAIMER (back top top) This is a publication of NStockDung-4/7/2000
207 (BSNS WIRE) National Financial Network Issues Research Report On Conolog Co Mike E.-4/7/2000
206 (BSNS WIRE) Conolog to Participate in Expanded Asian Trade Mission Conolog tMike E.-4/3/2000
205 Manfred--you are most honorable. And your actions lend credibility to the othePartyTime-4/2/2000
204 I have requested my post to be deleted. I have thought about it. I have just trManfred-4/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News