SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99 | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99

An SI Board Since July 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2340	25	0

Emcee: David Lawrence	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Here's a place for members to discuss beta activities (and avoid trashing the Welcome thread).

Beta feedback: beta.siliconinvestor.com

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2340	I can't stay much longer, Melinda The sun is getting high I can't help	AugustWest	-	2/24/2000
2339	New SI buggy today and yesterday - Classic is as fast as ever. I see we have g	Carolyn	-	1/5/2000
2338	I have tried to post on the BETA site and every time I have tried to post my Ne	traacs	-	12/19/1999
2337	well Bryan, I ain't gonna win any popularity contest with what is to follow	AugustWest	-	12/1/1999
2336	Dear Members, There are a variety of threads throughout SI, including this one	BryanB	-	11/18/1999
2335	Ok the snowbirds are here now in force so if you want to hear Levy's levity	levy	-	11/15/1999
2334	Bug report and question about the TOS. I posted it on the wrong thread earlier	DanZ	-	11/13/1999
2333	hey justin, keep the faith. it's being tended to... geocities.com :) m	mr.mark	-	11/13/1999
2332	Justin, The short answer is that we're still working on it, and until we&#	BryanB	-	11/12/1999
2331	What is the status of the alternate SI Classic format that's being develope	Justin C	-	11/12/1999
2330	Richard, The response time on "classic" seems fine. Have fun, Phil	Phil(bullrider)	-	11/12/1999
2329	Early on as the "new" SI was emerging a statement about response spee	ILCUL8R	-	11/12/1999
2328	I always make it a point to stop at at 909 BM. <g> Troy (a/k/a a daily	WTMHouston	-	11/11/1999
2327	I guess I used up my yearly allotment then. LOL	AugustWest	-	11/10/1999
2326	<i>I was in there last night, and my BMs stopped at 212(I may have under	bluejeans	-	11/10/1999
2325	Is there a set number of subjects one can have BMed in the Beta SI? I was in t	AugustWest	-	11/10/1999
2324	I think that's what Bryan meant when he said he had skin as thick as it nee	WTMHouston	-	11/10/1999
2323	Can someone here tell me if Bryan posted a response to this post: #reply-118623	Cheeky Kid	-	11/10/1999
2322	ROFLMAO! That made my day. Thanks! :)) Razor	Razorbak	-	11/10/1999
2321	Bryan, I have just discovered a "bug." When responding to a post th	Sarkie	-	11/10/1999
2320	<b>Smooch! </b> Is this what you meant when you posted about<i&	bluejeans	-	11/9/1999
2319	Dear Bryan: I take it that your response to Cheeky's proposal is a favorab	mph	-	11/9/1999
2318	LOL!!!!! Poor Cheeky... Talk about being Dropkicked through the uprights... I	c.horn	-	11/9/1999
2317	Dear Cheeky, After careful consideration of your input and analysis, I believe	BryanB	-	11/9/1999
2316	Nope I see it too! I can't believe what it says when I put the pointer ove	Cisco	-	11/9/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):