SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4467 83 0 SFE
Emcee:  Mark Sagarin Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2342 Moke, interesting thought. but I'd stay clear of that one. If SFe starts still learning-3/17/1999
2341 This is an idea for experts only who fully understand the risks and are willingmichael r potter-3/17/1999
2340 The maximum pullback should be to around $50 7/8. Unless the overall market tamichael r potter-3/17/1999
2339 Hello SFErs! I am new to the thread. Don't ask what took me so long, but I Sam Citron-3/17/1999
2338 It's not so much they all tank at once as it's hard to figure out what still learning-3/17/1999
2337 Still - thanks for the info. it sounded good until the last about all the compadabadabadoo-3/17/1999
2336 SFE is relatively unique in that way. TMO (thermo electron) is a similar incubstill learning-3/17/1999
2335 Mike - ooooh that's nice if SFE sharelholders get right to future IPOs. Yeadabadabadoo-3/17/1999
2334 Mike thanks for your comments. SFE just hit my radar 2 days ago so i did some Ddabadabadoo-3/17/1999
2333 Looks like SFE shareholders get rights to future IPOs. Are there any other stocM CAHILL-3/17/1999
2332 what in the world is driving volume in the first 1/2 hour to double its daily fdabadabadoo-3/17/1999
2331 Safeguard Scientifics Acquires Interest in Extant, Inc. - Under New 1999 Stratedavid barr-3/17/1999
2330 Musser on vcall.com @ 10:00 ( BW)(PA-VCALL-4)Safeguard Scientifics Ceo Interviprolific-3/17/1999
2329 After the move on 3-11-99 to $49 + $8 13/16, it was proposed that SFE was "michael r potter-3/17/1999
2328 Or, in a more traditional vein, how 'bout spinning off a rights offering ofstill learning-3/16/1999
2327 Proposal to SFE management. You are increasingly the owner of high priced currmichael r potter-3/16/1999
2326 Excuse me, Did you rich guys post this yet? Congratulations, NEW YORK (March Sheldon C.-3/16/1999
2325 If SFE takes 5 companies public and they're all Internet, does that mean thstill learning-3/16/1999
2324 I'm reposting this (came secondhand but still interesting. I'd like tostill learning-3/16/1999
2323 Musser on CNBC certainly helped. I had not heard about this company until yestdavid barr-3/16/1999
2322 Take it back. Guess it is the cause. NEW YORK, March 16 (Reuters) - Safeguardstill learning-3/16/1999
2321 I'm stunned with this move. Musser on CNBC can't be the cause. What&#still learning-3/16/1999
2320 What did he say,...something about investing in internet companies like CMGI inM CAHILL-3/16/1999
2319 What I'd love to see is a ss that shows SFE's effective onwership per sstill learning-3/16/1999
2318 -OT- SCAI follow up. Long term looks good, but listening to their conference cmichael r potter-3/16/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):