SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2401I think the judges are citing the existence of that other FL law, the one that sTraderGreg-11/16/2000
2400roger I have been busy figuring out who is going to be our next president.....I levy-11/16/2000
2399That should go down in the SI classics collection, Roger <g>Susan G-11/16/2000
2398You know I've been talking about this for 10 days now...LOOK! KLP-11/16/2000
2397Florida law doesn't seem to mean much anymore; the judges have caved in to tCarolyn-11/16/2000
2396Here are some sites on FL law...mention manual count....Some interesting materiaKLP-11/16/2000
2395LOL Roger....Thanks for the Post of the Week Laugh! And in all probability, truKLP-11/16/2000
2394Too bad it's not Hillary instead of Algore in this one. She would certainly CYBERKEN-11/16/2000
2393<b>A Question For The Ages...</b> Future historians may someday conRoger Sherman-11/16/2000
2392Does anyone know how to look up the Texas state guidelines for manual hand countDavid Howe-11/16/2000
2391Ahhh, no wonder things are so crazy....Look to the heavens..Maybe there is extraKLP-11/16/2000
2390That is correct...one must assume that some number of those were mistakes that uTraderGreg-11/16/2000
2389Wrong calculation .. <i>Almost 462,000 votes were cast in Palm Beach but Triffin-11/16/2000
2388If you have time to read this do so. It is a damning statistical analysis bordechomolungma-11/16/2000
2387<I>I was reading yesterday somewhere that Gore was asking for volunteer lasandintoes-11/16/2000
2386Re: Adobe cut and paste. Thanks, I tried it and it works! You have made my lichomolungma-11/16/2000
2385"Why would they be so crazy as to try and steal the election in a statCYBERKEN-11/16/2000
2384The joke with Algore is a play on Igor, the laboratory assistant to the Mad DoctIlaine-11/16/2000
2383<i>Democrat Election Official Manipulated Ballots, chomolungma-11/16/2000
2382There are at least eight lawsuits in Florida state courts, which I would lump toIlaine-11/16/2000
2381OK, I figured out how to cut and paste in Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.05, click the bIlaine-11/16/2000
2380<<It is the inspiration of that successful effort causing Algore to try toTraderGreg-11/16/2000
2379"Lawyers, litigation, and legalese are irritating, I agree. But to understaCYBERKEN-11/16/2000
2378Sorry, I didn't mean to infer the same action would go through two differentTraderGreg-11/16/2000
2377I was cutting and pasting from Adobe Acrobat 3, using Control-C and Control-V. Ilaine-11/16/2000
2376Thanks, I look forward to further interpretation. I don't think you can cutchomolungma-11/16/2000
2375The same issue is not going to be decided simultaneously in federal court and stIlaine-11/16/2000
2374I have Judge Lewis' Order in McDermott v. Harris (denying motion for a TRO aIlaine-11/16/2000
2373Ray, Ray, Ray. When you rail against the faulty ballots in Palm Beach County, wIlaine-11/16/2000
2372Looks like this thing will have two destinations...Tallahassee and Washington, DTraderGreg-11/16/2000
2371>>It is its inability to produce finality without multiple iterations.<Ilaine-11/16/2000
2370<i>I have not seen Harris' letter either, but look forward to it. If schomolungma-11/16/2000
2369That's good news for Dubya, isn't it? Listen, if you read anything abouIlaine-11/16/2000
2368I think I understand why I never pursued law. It is its inability to produce fiTraderGreg-11/16/2000
2367I just logged back onto SI, haven't read the thread yet so don't know ifIlaine-11/16/2000
2366That is so sad. Each side will view the other with suspicion for a long time. LCarolyn-11/16/2000
2365Joey---Bingo! The whole thing is about interpretation. While it may seem like iTraderGreg-11/16/2000
2364You have a good point. Elevator Al, trying to be magnanimous while hitting beloCarolyn-11/16/2000
2363<i>The judges MUST support the Rule of Law. </i> The cynical part ochomolungma-11/16/2000
2362Yes, I agree. All or nothing, if the initial 5 PM ruling is to be overturned. TCarolyn-11/16/2000
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):