SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
VGNX -- Variagenics, Inc.
An SI Board Since March 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
269 10 0 VGNX
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
244I only show the one block of 180K (now one, the second removed). But, re. your scaram(o)uche-12/4/2002
243Rick just saw another 180K go through at 1.62. Looks like the action may be picFindit-12/4/2002
242large cluster of modest trades at 1.65 just before the close, and two 180K blockscaram(o)uche-12/4/2002
241Message 18286247 <i>"Management teams are generally not inclined to nigel bates-12/2/2002
240<i>The Board could not have found a darker deal for shareholders...</i&nigel bates-11/25/2002
239finance.yahoo.com messages.yahoo.com messages.yahoo.com Again, I will vote &qscaram(o)uche-11/25/2002
238modest-sized after hours chunk, 21.8K at $1.33. (eom)scaram(o)uche-11/22/2002
237Interesting write-up of a recent paper on how many SNPs on a gene can interact, tuck-11/18/2002
236I'm showing 62K volume pre-open, but tick by tick only shows two trades, bloscaram(o)uche-11/18/2002
235<i>As far as pharmacogenomics is concerned, it doesn't take a high schnigel bates-11/18/2002
234<i>''When a stock is trading at half cash value, you don't neescaram(o)uche-11/17/2002
233(off topic) Wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!! Ever seen someone turn loosescaram(o)uche-11/15/2002
232Thanks!! (eom)scaram(o)uche-11/15/2002
231Rick, apart from the trades you saw, there was a blizzard of small trades from 1tom pope-11/15/2002
230Dunno. It's probably Housman's next venture. ;-( Just some academic sscaram(o)uche-11/15/2002
229Who the heck are Renegade? Related party? Can't find anything in Google relatom pope-11/15/2002
228<i>6. Related Party Transaction In July 2002, the Company entered intoscaram(o)uche-11/15/2002
227Rick I will vote alone with you if it comes to that. Although my few thousand sFindit-11/14/2002
226I have a nice chunk of the company. I'm going to do what is SIMPLY SMART, ascaram(o)uche-11/14/2002
225Jim perhaps we should start a threath subpart biotech management or for some adalroi-11/13/2002
224<i>Anybody else inclined to vote "no"?? </i> Mainly wish nigel bates-11/13/2002
223From todays Boston Globe... Cambridge-based Variagenics plans merger with Califrkrw-11/12/2002
22215%...... let's see if we can kill this deal? I own a decent chunk. Anyscaram(o)uche-11/12/2002
2218-K...... <i>The directors and certain executive officers of Hyseq, who cscaram(o)uche-11/12/2002
220United States Patent 6,475,736 Stanton, Jr. November 5, 2002 ------------scaram(o)uche-11/11/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News