SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Cymer (CYMI)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
25960 165 0 CYMI
Emcee:  Chris Grosse Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
24460 Brian, I am not sure if it is a disappointment (to me the stock was quite good,Zeev Hed-3/15/2000
24459 I just want to go on record as saying that this is the most disappointing stockProud_Infidel-3/15/2000
24458 Ginko, I don't think we are ready for a complete trend reversal, so I just Zeev Hed-3/15/2000
24457 Well Zeev - we broke major support on an intra-day basis. The real question - Ginko-3/15/2000
24456 Recently, we always see this morning rally, but it dissipates by 11 AM. We'Zeev Hed-3/14/2000
24455 Bloomberg showing NASDAQ futures index up 20 @11:02 CDST. I think (hope?) we&#Dale Knipschield-3/14/2000
24454 If you want to be religious, you really have to wait for violation of the old aZeev Hed-3/14/2000
24453 Dick, that is one reason the situation is somewhat precarious, CYMI should haveZeev Hed-3/14/2000
24452 Sam, to the extent that the lithography tools are powered by UV lasers and not Zeev Hed-3/14/2000
24451 Zeev, literally, "holding 51" is 3/8 of a point away. Because of the Berk-3/14/2000
24450 Zeev,I almost went to margin today.In the past five weeks I've done incredGary Kniffen-3/14/2000
24449 waht percent of all lasers for the pc chip industry are cymer lasers? seems liksammaster-3/14/2000
24448 With a large Call/Put ratio, I wonder if this weeks activity has anything to Backfill-3/14/2000
24447 Dick, actually, if we hold $51, the technicals are still all right, a breach ofZeev Hed-3/14/2000
24446 I, too, dislike conspiracy theories and prefer the answer that fits the known fBerk-3/14/2000
24445 I still feel that the reason CYMI hasn't performed as well as the other semorkrious-3/14/2000
24444 Nevin, Very rational approach. Jeff...Backfill-3/14/2000
24443 Bargains abound! Ok, if things were shaky in techville, would SLR have reportNevin S.-3/14/2000
24442 Brian, CYMI got down so fast, I did not notice it got into my buying range ($51Zeev Hed-3/14/2000
24441 Actually, although I didn't own CYMI at the time, I believe there was a lawBerk-3/14/2000
24440 <i>I wish someone would patent the 'politician' gene and then refjghutchison-3/14/2000
24439 I've used options in the past with other stocks, but Cymer's price moveScotMcI-3/14/2000
24438 Wow, I managed to pick up another 1k @ 52 1/4, only to see it drop another dollDale Knipschield-3/14/2000
24437 cymi price to sales ratio is between sfam,utek and amat... seems like p/s ratiosammaster-3/14/2000
24436 <i>**OT** Thank God they are making gene data public. The idea of profitScotMcI-3/14/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):