SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LSI Corporation
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
25814 176 0 LSI
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
25139Ms.JH: Thanks for the update. I hadn't checked the numbers lately. The besea_biscuit-8/12/2002
25138Andy, You may be right about LSI's valuations. However, I think that when sea_biscuit-8/12/2002
25137Mr. Dipy: To date, Jock's portfolio is doing very badly. He is down 54 percJock Hutchinson-8/12/2002
25136Dipy, But look at LSI specifically: it's trading at 1.57 times sales. It&#Andy M.-8/10/2002
25135Andy: The Nasdaq traded at 240 times (bogus)earnings at the peak. And today, isea_biscuit-8/9/2002
25134Yes, Dipy, you've been right, as I've said many times over the past two Andy M.-8/9/2002
25133Dipy, You were right. And I am pleased to admit that even though it has been veuu-8/9/2002
25132Addi: This is what I said on this thread in article #22119. It was on May 6, 2sea_biscuit-8/9/2002
25131Dipy, I managed another quick trip from 6.5 to 7 over the past day and am out oAndy M.-8/8/2002
25130Addi, You could probably use technical analysis for that. Frankly, I am not gosea_biscuit-8/7/2002
25129The problem is Dipy, I am not good at being a trader! For example with regsard tuu-8/6/2002
25128Addi, It makes no sense to get mad. Just trade the stock in and out. There arsea_biscuit-8/6/2002
25127> <i>Don't know why the market is surging so much today...</i>uu-8/6/2002
25126Sr K, Since there's more than one chip inside the PS2 and since the actual Andy M.-8/6/2002
25125I posted that because I thought IBM let it slip inadvertently (trying to justifySr K-8/5/2002
25124Got back in at $6.50. LSI is to some extent being dragged down by the rest of tAndy M.-8/5/2002
25123Ha! Didn't prevent the stock from falling another 10% (and the SOX from falsea_biscuit-8/5/2002
25122Sr K, Do you know if that's referring to IBM as a foundry for Sony, or whoeAndy M.-8/4/2002
25121From the Intel board at SI: Message 17832088 John Kelly, head of IBM's tecSr K-8/4/2002
25120Addi, I just went through your picks that I am keeping track of. When I saw sosea_biscuit-8/2/2002
25119<i>If bad numbers discourage the market, and a low market discourages capisea_biscuit-8/1/2002
25118I hope you're right. What I can't figure out is how all these real figuAndy M.-8/1/2002
25117Regarding those manufacturing numbers... I have always been under the impressionuu-8/1/2002
25116Dipy, Took my 10% and got out today. That money has done it's work for theAndy M.-8/1/2002
25115Samsung Selects LSI Logic ZiVA DVD Decoder for High-Volume, Mainstream DVD PlayeSemiBull-7/29/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):