SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
PLAYFAIR MINING - PLY . V
An SI Board Since May 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
505 11 0 PLY
Emcee:  Brumell Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
255I think they should option the entire property South and North. Of course there Claude Cormier-8/3/2001
254If the threat of a PP was removed, I'd buy more in a minute, Howy. While theBrumell-8/2/2001
253Bob: <<Until decisions are made, we can expect PLY to drift aimlessly.>TrueScouse-8/2/2001
252FWIW and IMO PLY have 3 options open to them. They are as follows: 1. They can Brumell-8/1/2001
251Wayne, There is only one that that is sure. There will be another up cycle in tClaude Cormier-7/31/2001
250remember skynight? He sent me this...good article. Could we be approaching capitTheBusDriver-7/31/2001
249Oil was the same way not so long ago....we will kick ass sooner or later..... wTheBusDriver-7/31/2001
248<I am shocked about the state of worldwide mining in all these metal commoditClaude Cormier-7/30/2001
247That's exactly my take. About three fourths is in the red on a cash cost basrusswinter-7/30/2001
246I am not sure I understand this chart... zinc cash cost moves higher as cumulatiClaude Cormier-7/30/2001
245A shocking look at world zinc production costs. Nobody is making any real money russwinter-7/30/2001
244bob.....have you noticed the increased hits on the stockhouse site for each messhedger-7/28/2001
243I don't like the idea either Claude. Doubt it would be 5 million units but 2Brumell-7/27/2001
242Bob, You have a good point of course. But the problemm is that they don't hClaude Cormier-7/27/2001
241It's a judgement call Claude. It can be viewed either way. From my point IBrumell-7/27/2001
240<PLY will only deal E1 South anomaly> Which is not reasonable in the currClaude Cormier-7/27/2001
239Hi JP, It was a good evening. Think you would have enjoyed it. Bottom line IBrumell-7/26/2001
238Thanks very much Bob, nice report. As someone else said a couple of weeks ago, jpthoma1-7/26/2001
237A few casual notes. It was a small meeting. Perhaps 10 people showed and I kBrumell-7/26/2001
236The following are notes taken from the Sudbury meeting. They reflect statements Brumell-7/26/2001
235Thanks for the information on the property.Elizabeth Andrews-7/26/2001
234Hello ELiz, I found this in a March 1999 press release by Layfield.. " LaClaude Cormier-7/25/2001
233What are the terms and conditions of the underlying property agreement? Royalty,Elizabeth Andrews-7/25/2001
232Last Call! If anyone else has a question they want me to ask Briggs, it's lBrumell-7/24/2001
231This being a tonnage play in the eyes of a senior producer, I can't imagine russet-7/23/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News