SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Visit Mr. Elliott.
An SI Board Since March 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
656 31 0
Emcee:  skinowski Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
256I am not interested in catching a wave down. Not nimble enough anyway. I still hawkeyefan-12/1/2005
255Well, it makes sense to me... Right now, Q's trade at 41.49 before the openskinowski-12/1/2005
254I guess I was thinking if qqqq took out 41.50 right away we should scoot right uhawkeyefan-11/30/2005
253I didn't buy anything today. It was one of my cycle days but felt uncomfortahawkeyefan-11/30/2005
252I've never traded AMD, but thinking about it. Active stock, nice volumes, dskinowski-11/30/2005
251I am following AMD for an options entry, awa Qcom; if I have available coin. I nspolar-11/30/2005
250AMD - the chart is easily amenable to a bearish interpretation. The entire rallskinowski-11/29/2005
249Fwiw I think the 4 can overlap the 1 - when it does the 5th will be terminal andnspolar-11/26/2005
248ski, pardon my comment on the channeling. I was thinking of the move up in the Nnspolar-11/26/2005
247Classically, 2 cannot go beyond the origin of 1. And 4 cannot overlap with 1 - skinowski-11/26/2005
246<i>And ... the move up in '03 was not an impulse with trend. It breaksskinowski-11/26/2005
245Do you ever find an impulse where the 2 actually comes back even with the beginnhawkeyefan-11/26/2005
244<i>You have the move down from the Nov. 04 top as an abc. I have it as a &skinowski-11/26/2005
243Agree with your a) and b) remarks. I see plenty of complex corrections, and yesskinowski-11/25/2005
242I have had that opinion for a long time. My number one ability is observation, nspolar-11/25/2005
241Been thinking about your posts. I like the energy of your charts, even though tskinowski-11/25/2005
240SKI - How to play it? I am thinking more telecom. Been lagging in general, timnspolar-11/24/2005
239You seen my HUI. I think most of you guys make mistakes by looking at dailies annspolar-11/24/2005
238In edit Ski ... the a:5 of the big X wave I have labeled was probably an a:3 ...nspolar-11/24/2005
237You are correct on the shorts.nspolar-11/24/2005
236Like this. ttrader.com I don't think everything you say is a series of nspolar-11/24/2005
235I should look at more charts. I didn't realize the SOX chart was so differehawkeyefan-11/24/2005
234Thanks. I wasn't aware of that as I have no experience with Qcharts. If youhawkeyefan-11/24/2005
233<i>I think Nasty started a iii of 3 up in October, and I think it will be skinowski-11/24/2005
232Qcharts has a feature to do that with the click of a mouse. I find it works vernspolar-11/24/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News