SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Tyco International Limited (TYC)
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3770 99 0 TYC
Emcee:  Terrapin Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2620Guys, where is TyCom in all this? I've read several most of the coverage muckraker71-1/26/2002
2619>>CC You have been pretty brutal on Kozlowski and TYCO lately.<< NotTatnic-1/26/2002
2618Tyco has been in a rut for the past two years because David Tice and other shortTerrapin-1/26/2002
2617>>The breakup valuations that several analysts have put out, centering aroTatnic-1/26/2002
2616CC You have been pretty brutal on Kozlowski and TYCO lately. Much inuendo and SPSEIFERT-1/26/2002
2615Its really not that complicated IMO. I've been watching tyc for quite a whilTatnic-1/25/2002
2614In regard to whether, absent a smoking gun, this negative sentiment about TYCO wBob Rudd-1/25/2002
2613One aspect this report didn't mention was the potential of growth in the secBob Rudd-1/25/2002
2612Tyco International (TYC $45.15; A-1-1-7 to B-1-1-7) Volatility Risk: Average 200deeno-1/25/2002
2611<<Fitch's rating for Tyco Capital is the same rating that they had forBob Rudd-1/25/2002
2610Fitch's rating for Tyco Capital is the same rating that they had for CIT befGVTucker-1/25/2002
2609This excerpt indicates that TYCO has indeed cleaned up and added value to CIT whBob Rudd-1/25/2002
2608Terrapin: If I take your point correctly, Greenberg and the short community may Bob Rudd-1/25/2002
2607Hi Bob, I agree that caution is in order with Tyco. I am probably a bit defensTerrapin-1/25/2002
2606Terrapin: Thanks for the good thought and well stated case. To be fair to the otBob Rudd-1/24/2002
2605CC, we've been over this already. Tyco has been pursuing a strategy of growTerrapin-1/24/2002
2604<<One thing that has not be discussed on this board is the about face TYC Bob Rudd-1/24/2002
2603My guess is those numbers might be optimistic...but that's just a guess. DreTatnic-1/24/2002
2602Larry, RE: the tax situation Go to the conference call just past the 15 minuteGVTucker-1/24/2002
2601This from today's WSJ <<Other observers wonder why Tyco is pursuing thBob Rudd-1/24/2002
2600GV, I'd appreciate seeing the exact words that substantiate your position. Larry S.-1/24/2002
2599Oh, no, Larry, it is definitely correct. In fact, if you look at the trading daGVTucker-1/24/2002
2598"incur a capital gains tax as a result of the spinoffs" - I don't Larry S.-1/24/2002
2597Bob, RE: <i>Sunk costs don't count...the question is: Does the separGVTucker-1/24/2002
2596While I haven't looked hard at the CIT purchase, If, as you say, a consideraBob Rudd-1/24/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):