SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
AT&T
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4298 131 0 T
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2648 lml, While reading your post I could not help draw a parallel to the OSI RefeFrank A. Coluccio-7/15/1999
2647 Courts were never intended to determine policy. They have only stepped in whenRobert Scott-7/15/1999
2646 Thanks for your insight, Frank. The courts, particularly appellate courts, typlml-7/15/1999
2645 There are a great many problems in arriving at a binary kind of on-off "whFrank A. Coluccio-7/15/1999
2644 . . . and that's why this issue is properly within the jurisdiction of thelml-7/15/1999
2643 Of course, the FCC can <b>do</b> as it pleases, but they are not stFrank A. Coluccio-7/15/1999
2642 Fidelity's Magellan Adds AT&T , Lucent to Top 10 Holdings JakeStraw-7/15/1999
2641 <b>http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-10516753</b> Mark Palmberg-7/15/1999
2640 I just saw this on the ATHM thread. Armstrong talking to the Senate yesterday.polarisnh-7/15/1999
2639 Robert, Good answer! My point about the FCC 'stepping in' is based uppolarisnh-7/15/1999
2638 The FCC under its authority from Congress can step in and say that they preemptRobert Scott-7/15/1999
2637 Interesting point. First, what does Steve mean by "step in?" The Flml-7/15/1999
2636 <i>I think that you will see the FCC step in under AT&T pressure to sFR1-7/15/1999
2635 I can certainly understand why he hasn't responded: 1. He asked the writeRobert Scott-7/14/1999
2634streetadvisor.comRascal-7/14/1999
2633 This article completely misses a key & CRITICAL point. There is no competiRobert Scott-7/14/1999
2632 I don't agree with that previous article but I thought it provided some goopolarisnh-7/14/1999
2631 Embracing Congress' Cable Moves July 13, 1999 If Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA)polarisnh-7/14/1999
2630 oilbabe, I can't imagine it will be very good for AT&T but I think thapolarisnh-7/14/1999
2629 Florida government votes to open cable lines NEW YORK, July 14 (Reuters) - A Fpolarisnh-7/14/1999
2628 Any ideas on how the Broward County, Fla. ruling will affect T stock? Drop can&oilbabe-7/14/1999
2627 I like this news: <b>http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/990713/ca_at_t_1.html</bMark Palmberg-7/13/1999
2626 News Corp says finalises Fox/Liberty deal SYDNEY, July 13 (Reuters) - News Corpolarisnh-7/13/1999
2625 Thank-you, you have made my point. Rascal-7/12/1999
2624 Sorry, I didn't mean to sound testy. Short was all I wanted. See "VKirk ©-7/12/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):