SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4504 44 0 MAN
Emcee:  Mark Bartlett Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2654 Mineman, I am no mining engineer, but 3 different sources told me they think tClaude Cormier-6/29/1999
2653 << Drilling is now being done outside this gossan and so will not interseClaude Cormier-6/29/1999
2652 1980 drilling showed the sulphides did not extend beyond the 300 m X 600 m (975mineman-6/29/1999
2651 The oxide-layer varies from 4 to 18 m (13 to 58 ft) so would be impossible to mmineman-6/29/1999
2650 Mineman, A premature evaluation, IMO. I suggest you wait until in-fills comes Claude Cormier-6/29/1999
2649 The 11 m (36 ft) thick gold-enhanced oxide-layer 15 m (50 ft) deep is completelmineman-6/29/1999
2648 <<Wasn't gold in the $600 to $800 level in 1979-80? Why didn't BRClaude Cormier-6/29/1999
2647 Jeff, I am also wondering if BRGM felt they had established enough value in thMark Bartlett-6/29/1999
2646 Avg price of gold in 1979 was $303, avg. in 1980 was $613. They sampled for Jeff Dickson-6/29/1999
2645 Wasn't gold in the $600 to $800 level in 1979-80? Why didn't BRGM assayElizabeth Andrews-6/29/1999
2644 <<2B or not 2B, is that the question>> I love it. Claude Cormier-6/28/1999
2643 Hi Howy I agree we have support in the $5.50 range...but we also are BUILD soTheBusDriver-6/28/1999
2642 <<I think you've seen the dips >> There will ALWAYS be dips. TheBusDriver-6/28/1999
2641 << Me thinks the stock price is at the mercy of the contents of the deposTheBusDriver-6/28/1999
2640 I'll have to admit, it sounds pretty funny .... Not_Active-6/28/1999
2639 For sure the potential of the trade depends in part on the distance between resNot_Active-6/28/1999
2638 Jeff: <<2B or not 2B, is that the question?>> LOL!! ....Whether &TrueScouse-6/28/1999
2637 <i>Th eproblem may be that once you realize it is a 2B, </i> 2B oJeff Dickson-6/28/1999
2636 <<The trader side of me would lighten up at the top (on a 2B) with the idClaude Cormier-6/28/1999
2635 <<SWG! 3.30 & 3.50>> Among others. Claude Cormier-6/28/1999
2634 <<Now is an opportunity to search and look for the next MAN that is selliterry-6/28/1999
2633 If I see a failure at the high as bearish, its really bearish strictly in the sNot_Active-6/27/1999
2632 Kacy: Interesting analysis.... I don't disagree with it at all. However, TrueScouse-6/27/1999
2631 <<I agree Howy - although I do expect to stay above 6+ until the next newClaude Cormier-6/27/1999
2630 I have to agree on your longer-term assessment, Howy. In the short term, INot_Active-6/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News