SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Net Perceptions, Inc. (NETP)
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2908 31 0 NETP
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2683Carl: Not to re-open the debate - but reading your response to Sofa Kingdom it rupert1-8/12/2000
2682Better check that dilution between your ears. This stock is heading further SoutVocco_the_punk-8/12/2000
2681This represents the dilution between 1Q and 2Q this year. It includes the additrupert1-8/12/2000
2680Carl: Thanks, I had worked it out by tracking the growth in the average number rupert1-8/12/2000
2679Sofa Kingdom, you seem to miss my point, and that is that a bubble is a bubble iCarl R.-8/12/2000
2678Regarding the low number of shares in Q2 99, that is because the IPO took place Carl R.-8/12/2000
2677Carl R., You should probably graph skirt length and the width of the dark band Sofa Kingdom-8/12/2000
2676The NETP chart from March to August 1999 is almost exactly the same as for the srupert1-8/12/2000
2675Institutional Holdings There appears to be a large discrepancy between the datarupert1-8/12/2000
2674Carl: I don't know what the composition of the DOT is - I suspect it is hearupert1-8/12/2000
2673I guess the proof is in the pudding. Compare a graph of the DOT index over the lCarl R.-8/12/2000
2672Compare NETP share price at end of 2Q 2000 with end of 2Q 1999. 1999 Number of rupert1-8/12/2000
2671Carl: I disagree for all the reasons stated. The business plan of the biotecrupert1-8/12/2000
2670Victor, I guess that this is another place we'll disagree, though we do agreCarl R.-8/11/2000
2669good insight.Vocco_the_punk-8/11/2000
2668Holy Cow Diver/BernieFAg/Vocco_su_cks/ and now Vocco_the_Punk, no sooner do I pobernieb2-8/11/2000
2667Missing the point again, I see...the idea is that all of the other investors wilVocco_the_punk-8/11/2000
2666bernieb2: The "Ignore" button here is even more efficient than on Rarupert1-8/11/2000
2665Perhaps you are afraid of competition because you view it as such. It is supposeVocco_the_punk-8/11/2000
2664I have to believe that NETP is still overvalued at this price...$6 seems to be aVocco_the_punk-8/11/2000
2663bernie: On the other hand, you could diversify, not only in the sector but elserupert1-8/11/2000
2662Vocco, interesting that we're almost at the point where $9.75 wouldn't bbernieb2-8/11/2000
2661WST: When last seen on SI you were pumping NETP & ASKJ near their all-time Jimbo Cobb-8/11/2000
2660Carl: I thought that sentence might provoke a response! I dont think it is as rupert1-8/11/2000
2659Bernie: Its good to remember that $11 now is the equivalent of about $13+ last rupert1-8/10/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News