SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Discussion Thread
An SI Board Since May 2008
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3816 14 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2691<I> 73 is still alot less than 91 </i> And top nominal income taxTimF-11/10/2008
2690that post is yours timc.hinton-11/10/2008
2689POOR TIM...cant see beyond your own nose or even 2 months in the future! and yoc.hinton-11/10/2008
2688Tim ,its best to have more than one weapon in ones arsenal. and right now with c.hinton-11/10/2008
2687Tim i posted those tables in the first place ...and you still have failed to proc.hinton-11/10/2008
2686<I> now do some work of your own and quantify the extent of the loopholes.TimF-11/10/2008
2685 No, you've quoted a post, where someone talks about how in the past they pTimF-11/10/2008
2684ROTFL.....then why bother bringing it to our attention.c.hinton-11/10/2008
2683It wasn't a prognosis. It was a statement about the present (the currently TimF-11/10/2008
2682tim you need not repeat back to me the data i supplied you in the first place...c.hinton-11/10/2008
2681i have supplied your post specifying it as a head tax.c.hinton-11/10/2008
2680<I> you raise taxes to choke off inflation ....when inflation is out of coTimF-11/10/2008
2679how quickly your prognosis turned out to be wrong!c.hinton-11/10/2008
2678 But its a much more important factor when you have much higher nominal tax ratTimF-11/10/2008
2677you raise taxes to choke off inflation ....when inflation is out of controll. tc.hinton-11/10/2008
2676<I> "I’ve blogged <b>before</b> about my federael budget TimF-11/10/2008
2675and the country is in deep financial dog doo todayc.hinton-11/10/2008
2674<I> do you think loop holes did not exist in the 20s. </i> No to TimF-11/10/2008
2673and that would apply to the 20s as well.c.hinton-11/10/2008
2672<I> and it is still a head tax. </i> No it isn't a head tax. TimF-11/10/2008
2671gee1 head tax appers in the 2nd line of tims post........ Message 25154855 &quc.hinton-11/10/2008
2670<I> "I’ve blogged before about my federael budget plan: cut spending TimF-11/10/2008
2669Tim i will accept keynes expert knowledge before your amateur guesses any day. c.hinton-11/10/2008
2668<I> hey tim !remember how you were saying AIG was not a bailout </i>TimF-11/10/2008
2667tim .get real ,all you have said is that there were loop holes....do you think lc.hinton-11/10/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News