SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silicon Motion Inc. (SIMO)
An SI Board Since October 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3017 83 1 SIMO
Emcee:  Elroy Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2716This is the article I referenced earlier about shareholder loss being the best mElroy-8/15/2023
2715Does this mean no target company has had it's acquisition wrongfully terminaElroy-8/15/2023
2714Yes, ConEd involved a material breach by the buyer. As for timeline, I don'Anonymous895-8/15/2023
2713Yes, I understand your position. I guess I'm just very surprised how littleElroy-8/15/2023
2712Your second citation actually agrees with the speaker that the ConEd case changeAnonymous895-8/15/2023
2711Here's an article saying the case he cited is not likely to be used going foElroy-8/15/2023
2710He doesn't have to be a lawyer to cite precedents (he starts out by saying tAnonymous895-8/15/2023
2709While he does cite precedents, he is not (I think??) a lawyer. So it's hardElroy-8/15/2023
2708Maybe hard to believe, but he cited two precedents that said exactly that (Con EAnonymous895-8/15/2023
2707I watched that video. The Speaker claims that the damages for willful breach ofElroy-8/15/2023
2706Focus Capital's Mordechai Yavneh returns to explain how $SIMO / $MXL deal feyugolee1234-8/15/2023
2705The MXL CFO did a Needham video chat today just before market end. He said abouElroy-8/9/2023
2704I would then ask if their lawyers advised them to cancel the deal........Elroy-8/9/2023
2703No doubt they will preempt questions by saying that they can't talk about itSam-8/9/2023
2702Interesting - MXL is presenting at an investor conference tomorrow (Wed). I wonElroy-8/8/2023
2701When the facts aren't on your side, pound the law. When the law isn't onSam-8/8/2023
2700<i>my guess is that they are huffing and bluffing and hoping SIMO will go Elroy-8/8/2023
2699I'm reading the English translation of the SAMR approval document..... samrElroy-8/8/2023
2698Since they don't state any specific "material adverse effects" or Sam-8/8/2023
2697What does this 'choice of words' error tell you about MXL's lawyers?Elroy-8/8/2023
2696Hmmmm. Who has any clue what is the way that this works out well for MXL? I caElroy-8/7/2023
2695MXL responds with ..... nothing? -- CARLSBAD, Calif., August 07, 2023--( BUSINElroy-8/7/2023
2694Dear Mr. Litchfield, I write on behalf of Silicon Motion Technology CorporationElroy-8/7/2023
2693The Singapore courts are really inefficient. The Delaware court where Twitter suyugolee1234-8/6/2023
2692<i>Depending on the money involved this could take years to resolve.</iElroy-8/5/2023
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):