SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
METRICOM - Wireless Data Communications
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3376 49 0 MCOM
Emcee:  Stephen Ettorre Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2751Hmmmmm....back to $10.125 x $10.188. Looks like you are correct about that streJohn Curtis-11/27/2000
2750Geez- I usually don't put my entry price here. Those nasty shorts probably crrufff-11/27/2000
2749<i>Where are....</i> LOL! Like I said....MCOM's at that point John Curtis-11/27/2000
2748Geez - they don't like my money. Went to 3/8 and I'm in for 1/4. Thoughrrufff-11/27/2000
2747Yup, it could be a good traders entry point. But as for strength.....well.....hJohn Curtis-11/27/2000
2746I agree. I'm putting in for a trade at 9 1/4. Looks like I may get hit. Corrufff-11/27/2000
2745$9.656 x $9.68. Okay...a little later than normal, but MCOM is now experiencingJohn Curtis-11/27/2000
2744Rruff: MCOM does have the appearance of finally basing down here in the $10 ranJohn Curtis-11/27/2000
2743John, I think you've called this as good as anyone. It's an incredible trrufff-11/27/2000
2742Rruff: Exactly so. It's oxymoronic (is that a word?) to consider wireless John Curtis-11/27/2000
2741I think this is the key <i>My gut tells me there's almost no customerrrufff-11/27/2000
2740More WSJ Trashing of Wireless Web. <<Voice Challenges the Screen In Race Herc-11/27/2000
2739Today's WSJ Editorial Page <<Who Will Win On the Wireless Web? By JonHerc-11/27/2000
2738>>>>>Loser makes $100 contribution to your charity Ditto :-)majormember-11/27/2000
2737Great report...$Mogul-11/27/2000
2736I don't know Caxton. All you can do is post hypothetical garbage about QCOM rrufff-11/27/2000
2735To get back on topic, I just want to point share the anecdote that in the DC metGreg S.-11/27/2000
2734rruff, What a joke you are. <i>I don't object to posters who have somCaxton Rhodes-11/27/2000
2733OT It's funny how things go on these threads. I actually do contribute to serrufff-11/26/2000
2732>>>>>>It's OT because it doesn't add to the debate rrmajormember-11/26/2000
2731>>>>>>>I challenge you to learn how to spell "challengmajormember-11/26/2000
2730Skane, I don't have the time to respond to your OT post. It's OT becausrrufff-11/26/2000
2729I challenge you to learn how to spell "challenge" and "veracity&qvibaby-11/26/2000
2728>>>>>>>>>All one has to do is to look at your posts. majormember-11/26/2000
2727Skane, All one has to do is to look at your posts. You are a bum kisser. Most orrufff-11/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):