SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Vantive Corporation
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3033 15 0 VNTV
Emcee:  bluepilot5 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2783 Siebel does have a lot of momentum, however, their space is confined to the verWalker-2/20/1999
2782 I said that it was undervalued based on P/S but not on P/E. I am taking your aP314159d-2/20/1999
2781 >>I'm betting with my money that it will not be Siebel. Why? SiebeWizard-2/19/1999
2780 Yes, but Siebel takes a factor of 3-5 to purchase and install. Siebel is tryinWalker-2/19/1999
2779 From my perspective, this 'e-customer' marketing image is just that -- Lee L.-2/19/1999
2778 I was kidding! There is a disconnect in the appropriate valuation for onxs andTrader Dave-2/19/1999
2777 ONYX will not buy vantive! The technologies are incompatible and ONYX is growiWalker-2/19/1999
2776 >>Did you see the new positioning as an e-customer company? yah. LuonWizard-2/19/1999
2775 And those initial splash screens would make a great example for webpagesthatsucEarly Out-2/19/1999
2774 Did you see the new positioning as an e-customer company? It looks like the poTrader Dave-2/19/1999
2773 Well, VNTV is now below 10. I guess I'll probably get to keep my shares. ThBald Eagle-2/19/1999
2772 VNTV has been shopping the company for a long period of time and there have beeWizard-2/19/1999
2771 I think this is a ridiculously cheap stock for several reasons: Valuation to sseth thomas-2/19/1999
2770 <<If you sold a Dec 7 call and the price was above that at expiration daBald Eagle-2/19/1999
2769 Would you be a buyer in the 10 area, Steve? I respect your opinion, but I stilP314159d-2/18/1999
2768 Bald Eagle: Although I have sold covered calls on occassion I have always repu45bday-2/18/1999
2767 Well, here I am again. It's almost like deja vu all over again. I sold VNTBald Eagle-2/18/1999
2766 Totally new VNTV positioning and marketing. Check out their home page (vantiveseth thomas-2/18/1999
2765 I agree in general. Been reading this thread since June and I say the 6-9 montP314159d-2/4/1999
2764 <<Well, it looks like I might have made a mistake by selling Feb 10 coverBald Eagle-2/3/1999
2763 If you are hoping for a recovery like clarify, you'll have to be patient. Trader Dave-2/3/1999
2762 Can I assume you felt that the internal operations mgmt disagreed on this issueP314159d-2/2/1999
2761 Well, it's dipping, 10 is obvious, the others I'd rather not see. HappP314159d-2/2/1999
2760 My apologies, I get all these Cyber companies mixed up...http://www.zdnet.com/iDavid R. Doerr-2/2/1999
2759 huh? seth thomas-2/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News