SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LORAL -- Political Discussion
An SI Board Since May 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
880 2 0
Emcee:  Dragonfly Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
280 Seems pretty clear everyone gets a waiver. Contributer or not. And it bears rDragonfly-5/28/1998
279 And you are an uninformed rightist windbag who voted for Clinton! Talk about a Bernard Levy-5/28/1998
278 <i>Reagan and Bush had nothing to do with Loral's illegal transfer ofDragonfly-5/28/1998
277 When challenged, I have justified my position. When challenged, you have whineDragonfly-5/28/1998
276 <i>The facts are not in dispute. Loral has acknowledged that in 1996 itsDragonfly-5/28/1998
275 Zoltan!, You did it again! LORAL and Hughes are public companies. Their statebrian h-5/28/1998
274 You want facts? Now this is a fact! Jerry Falwell was seated next to PresidentBill-5/28/1998
273 <I>Nobody said Reagan or Bush was in favor of a specific waiver, only thaBill-5/28/1998
272 Oh, that's much better. You're not a Clinton supporter, just a bagboy fBill-5/28/1998
271 Wonder how much that cost? I find your position rather interesting. Last njlallen-5/28/1998
270 Coincidentally off the hook IrZoltan!-5/28/1998
269 This is from the AOL Loral board: <i>Subject: Loral Conf Call Date: Wed,Dragonfly-5/27/1998
268 <i>As closed as your mind. Good night for now. JLA</i> I take thaDragonfly-5/27/1998
267 Gee, you can't find an error in my statements about launch capabilities? IDragonfly-5/27/1998
266 As closed as your mind. Good night for now. JLA jlallen-5/27/1998
265 <i>I have also made a number of factual posts which are directly contraryDragonfly-5/27/1998
264 I don't know about that. The tactic seems to satisfy you. JLA jlallen-5/27/1998
263 <i>Once you acknowledge that you were wrong I'd be happy to discuss Dragonfly-5/27/1998
262 Thank you, thread sheriff. JLA jlallen-5/27/1998
261 Which is why you respond to every single message I post. Uh, huh. Dragonfly Dragonfly-5/27/1998
260 JLA: You accused Dragonfly of making up his satellite and launch data. PleaseBernard Levy-5/27/1998
259 I have also made a number of factual posts which are directly contrary to your jlallen-5/27/1998
258 That would imply that I placed some importance on anything you had to say. Obvjlallen-5/27/1998
257 <i>Prosecutors for the State of MD have publicly stated that they are defDragonfly-5/27/1998
256 In other words, you really don't know what you are talking about. I made aDragonfly-5/27/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):