SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums
Questions and Answers with SI Admin (s)
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4897 272 0
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2845Ignore? Message 21469491 Why can't ignore mean just that? ignore. If you nTigerPaw-7/1/2005
2844It's just another leg in a litany of routing issues that have been occurringSI Dave-6/27/2005
2843Well, I've been having this problem for two weeks at least.ild-6/27/2005
2842It's been going on for 3 nights running. Given the fact that the routing somSI Dave-6/27/2005
2841I understand that it's not me. What is it? Some misconfigured router?ild-6/27/2005
2840It isn't you. We're seeing the same thing. We were getting routed to FraSI Dave-6/27/2005
2839Hi, I'm in California on DSL. In the last couple weeks I've been having ild-6/27/2005
2838I can add a couple more if you'd like. :-) You've got a LOOOONG walk toLazarus_Long-6/2/2005
2837Well, yes and no. Just like with Matt. I'm "The Boss" (and, no, SI Bob-6/2/2005
2836 Are you Dave's boss?TimF-6/2/2005
2835I'm banned from 2 threads? Cool! I don't have any political clout arouSI Bob-6/1/2005
2834the law has yet to be written on this issue, but it could be possible at some poGreen Receipt-5/27/2005
2833<i>"or perhaps when the new cloning laws are in place you can live foEdscharp-5/27/2005
2832or perhaps when the new cloning laws are in place you can live foreverGreen Receipt-5/26/2005
2831#reply-21347410d:oug-5/23/2005
2830<i>It's a sad thing that most of them are ineligible</i> Yup. Done, gone.-5/21/2005
2829I want to see bob’s response to my post. <i>Today's morons can't Tom C-5/21/2005
2828Hope not! Today's morons can't hold a candle to 1999's crop. Taht Done, gone.-5/21/2005
2827<i> I doubt it. Who knows... maybe in a couple of years when we look backTom C-5/21/2005
2826Tom, I doubt it. <i>Who knows... maybe in a couple of years when we look John Sladek-5/21/2005
2825<i>Agree. They're morons. </i> Who knows... maybe in a couple oTom C-5/21/2005
2824Agree. They're morons. Snot funny.Done, gone.-5/21/2005
2823SI Bob, Do you think it’s unreasonable to discourage political posts on the thrTom C-5/21/2005
2822Edit...found the problem...my bad99Dan-5/18/2005
2821Fixed. "because" is a "noise word", meaning it occurs too fSI Bob-5/17/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):