SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GX Investors Thread
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
586 21 0 GX
Emcee:  qveauriche Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
286What did you think anyone with half a brain would have sold GX to $3? Why shoulSun Tzu-9/7/2001
285I saw that as well? Doesn't make much sense does it? So I ignored it. But itBWAC-9/7/2001
284Secured financing for what? To pay off debt that won't come due for a couplDWB-9/7/2001
283Myer, Robert says his progress on completing his updated forecasts has been delCRL-9/7/2001
282That's some good news. Since you are in touch with Robert S., do you know hiMyer-9/7/2001
281<b>Global Crossing and Telstar International Sign $15 Million Agreement<spred-9/6/2001
280Very interesting and relevant. Thanks for posting that. Maybe Winnick and his buHW Bowman-9/6/2001
279Per Jay Fisk in #277, you are very right.HW Bowman-9/6/2001
278Congratulations to Robert Sheldon and his wife on the birth of their third childCRL-9/6/2001
277"We always wanted to improve the portion of services in our business becausJay Fisk-9/6/2001
276<< that managed services were working out nicely and constituted (I believDukeCrow-9/6/2001
275HW, Thanks for the commentary. I thought the revenue from EXDS was higher. MuchKJ. Moy-9/5/2001
274When it all comes out in the wash, it will be interesting to see what transpiredHW Bowman-9/5/2001
273OK, let's give it a shot here... oh, by the way, Casey is the current CEO...DWB-9/3/2001
272<< and the circle goes round and round... >> I suspected I would haKJ. Moy-9/3/2001
271>Yes, really! Here's an easy experiment to prove the point. Next time youAlly-9/3/2001
270<Yes, they are. They might not know it but they are. All contracts where dollMaurice Winn-9/3/2001
269>>Net Tangible Asset Value =(C.A.+Net P&E)-Total Liabilities from 10Q JimieA-9/2/2001
268I'm no financial wizard and therefore can't say one way or another whethcarranza2-9/2/2001
267<i>Yes, they are. They might not know it but they are. All contracts whereAlly-9/2/2001
266Greeting: Please comment as appropriate. First, the debit analysis provided frBearcatbob-9/2/2001
265Hi Carranza2, "The bottom line is that its tangible book value is negativjerrybuchanan66-9/2/2001
264<<i>It does take a more knowledgeable sales person to relate to the buyMaurice Winn-9/2/2001
263Hello Maurice, (Mqurice?) I am not sure of the proper salutation for such anakmike-9/2/2001
262Message 16289878DHE-9/1/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):