SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Canada Southern Petroleum (CSPLF/CSW)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
911 8 0 CSW
Emcee:  scott dennis Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
286 Yes this is true, wells are being abandoned, but it is far cheaper to abandon aRob Skaff-8/23/1997
285 Do you mean this item on Anderson's part Please note: The NEB has requestekfdkfd-8/23/1997
284 I agree. I would prefer to see a settlement as well. Less costly and would elimHenry Volquardsen-8/23/1997
283 Whether it's logic or omens, if the result is the same it's all okay wiRob Skaff-8/23/1997
282 Rob, if you believe in omens the trial is scheduled to restart on my birthday..Henry Volquardsen-8/20/1997
281 Maybe people will soon speculate that rather than go back to court we will havRob Skaff-8/20/1997
280 Looks like volumne picking up today. Assume as we get closer to trial start up,kfdkfd-8/20/1997
279 Think the $3.7 is added to the $16+ million. CSW share is about $1.1+ million.aknahow-8/19/1997
278 Kevin- That's just great! Just when CSW starts getting their carried intereWR61499-8/19/1997
277 Update 8/19 on payoff Click web site, numbers are scrambled. Progress this montkfdkfd-8/19/1997
276 Anderson did work on the field. Also production was down.kfdkfd-8/16/1997
275 Did frank say why only $500,000 was paid off between Feb. and June?WR61499-8/16/1997
274 Latest FXC news, pay off now 1st Qtr. 1998. Only $500,000 was paid off from Febkfdkfd-8/16/1997
273 I agree that's the probable outcome although your price might be a bit highDon Sherrill-8/14/1997
272 It's in the 10q but Curzio does mention it in his 4 page summary at the topDon Sherrill-8/14/1997
271 Rob, your last two posts appear to be responding to me and I think we are sayinHenry Volquardsen-8/14/1997
270 Can I be the first to speculate that ANDERSON will take the company over near tRob Skaff-8/14/1997
269 Do you really think the 1000 vote rule will prevent the sale from being approveRob Skaff-8/14/1997
268 I justnever saw anything in writing that MPET was suing along with CSW. FXCs cRob Skaff-8/14/1997
267 I hear you George. I actually sympathize and share your apparent frustration wiHenry Volquardsen-8/14/1997
266 MPET's position changes via the 8% interest in the trial. If you simplify CDon Sherrill-8/14/1997
265 Realize my post sounded like the judgment of the majority rules while I really aknahow-8/14/1997
264 No offense George but the "judgement of many" has been responsible foHenry Volquardsen-8/14/1997
263 John Buckley Sr. I believe is dead. There is no Buckley control that I know ofaknahow-8/14/1997
262 George the reason it held up was because I sold 2/3 of mine :). I was just tryiDon Sherrill-8/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):