SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR)
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3386 84 0 XMSR
Emcee:  HiSpeed Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2861<I>I will tell you that in my OPINION. That many of the Music Channels on i-node-9/23/2006
2860<i> Are you taking acid? </i> You see folks. When you do "pickpcstel-9/23/2006
2859<I>It has absolutly nothing to do with the question at hand. </I> Ai-node-9/23/2006
2858<i> As recently as two weeks ago, David Frear, the CFO at Sirius, stated tpcstel-9/23/2006
2857>> Doesn't matter.. SIRI's business model is Retail Heavy. As rei-node-9/23/2006
2856<I> Sirius has never provided a conversion rate from promo subscribers to pcstel-9/23/2006
2855<I>It does if you don't know what you're talking about. </I>pcstel-9/23/2006
2854The record speaks for itself as does yours, particularly your predictions of $60rrufff-9/22/2006
2853<I>It appears that a larger percentage of overall initial subscribers decii-node-9/22/2006
2852<i>It's simple. OEM promo subscribers get a certain amount of time to kovachs-9/22/2006
2851<i> Well, both stocks have behaved like dogs -- but I have to admit havingpcstel-9/22/2006
2850<i> Nobody here has "picked apart" my logic yet -- that's thpcstel-9/22/2006
2849<I>You need to read a bit more carefully, then.</I> If you believe i-node-9/22/2006
2848ANA, RE: <i>Nobody here has "picked apart" my logic yet</i&gGVTucker-9/22/2006
2847<I>Yes, I know you can pick apart that logic. But guess what, it is ratheri-node-9/22/2006
2846<i> That's all you've got. It is interesting that your arguments hpcstel-9/22/2006
2845Sheesh. If you don't think you've heard anyone give a fundamental argumGVTucker-9/22/2006
2844Okay, big shot. Make the case. Yeah, I know. They're both popsicle standsi-node-9/22/2006
2843<I> What it interesting is that NOT ONE OF YOU has yet to put forth a cogepcstel-9/22/2006
2842Oh, okay. I'm with you. Nevermind the financials or the fundamentals. Ya i-node-9/22/2006
2841It's been discussed many times. Both are highly speculative high risk, and rrufff-9/22/2006
2840What it interesting is that NOT ONE OF YOU has yet to put forth a cogent argumeni-node-9/22/2006
2839You are something else. You mention XMSR is a $60 stock but then you say <irrufff-9/22/2006
2838<i> The focus of my remarks is, and has been, that XM is out-executing Sirpcstel-9/22/2006
2837>>> That's funny from someone who has continually given a price tari-node-9/22/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):