SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
SABRATEK CORP (SBTK)
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
487 11 0
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
287 Raining off and on. Had to cancel my golf game. Bummer. mod-7/1/1999
286 <I>So now you're calling Pluvia a liar?</I> Aww, you ruined thKevin Podsiadlik-7/1/1999
285 mod, how is the weather there in fantasy land? BarbMama Bear-7/1/1999
284 Well, if you're going to engage in definitional hair-splitting, definition Kevin Podsiadlik-7/1/1999
283 Kevin wrote: <i>TINCRAP = There Is No Committee Referred to As Pluvia.&lmod-7/1/1999
282 THanks for the explanation.Peter V-7/1/1999
281 TINCRAP = There Is No Committee Referred to As Pluvia.Kevin Podsiadlik-7/1/1999
280 Kevin, Read definition number 2, fits CRAP's posts on SBTK to a tee. Nextmod-7/1/1999
279 <<TINCRAP>>?? I thought it was Princess Bride. <I>InconceivPeter V-7/1/1999
278 OK, here is his list. Since I am not familiar with SRCM, how about letting me mod-7/1/1999
277 <I>But I take it CRAP's <B>promises</B> of SRCM trading hKevin Podsiadlik-7/1/1999
276 No thanks, I tend to agree with CRAP on SRCM as an investment. But I take it Cmod-7/1/1999
275Kevin Podsiadlik-7/1/1999
274 I don't know the SI MW, but as far as I can tell he seems to have battled Cmod-7/1/1999
273 Ah, So you do know MW. Smilodon-7/1/1999
272 Isn't SRCM another company where CRAP (Committee Reporting As Pluvia) promimod-7/1/1999
271 ROFL!! Good one Pluvia-7/1/1999
270 Why, the person who publicly offered it of course: #reply-10113660 Not directeKevin Podsiadlik-7/1/1999
269 If you followed SRCM, you would know how funny that comment really was. <&lSmilodon-7/1/1999
268 Just one more question, who sent you the hard copy of the amended filing? mod-7/1/1999
267 Case closed. Smilodon-7/1/1999
266 Who told you that? Are their initials MW by any chance? mod-7/1/1999
265 *** SEC INVESTIGATING SBTK FOR ACCOUNTING FRAUD? *** Word I hear is YES... Pluvia-7/1/1999
264 I still have a copy; the date stamp was "June 7". Pluvia first mentiKevin Podsiadlik-7/1/1999
263 I don't, but you can find out by contacting the clerk for that district. Smilodon-7/1/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):