SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Computer Associates
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5232 59 0 CA
Emcee:  Everard Taylor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2882 geeze...your friends told you soros did what? get lost! hypster Box-By-The-Riviera™-8/6/1998
2881 Hi All- I'm new to this page but have been a SI member for some time. I usJ. Reed-8/6/1998
2880 Right you are, Peter. It was a "done deal" when the shareholder'sBostonView-8/6/1998
2879 <<In fact, when the bid for CSC drove CA's price down and jeopardizedPeter Eicher-8/6/1998
2878 700 new feet on the street, a solid reinforcement for CA's new Global GroupBostonView-8/5/1998
2877 P.M.Freedman: It is good to see that Wang is carrying through on the executionrupert1-8/5/1998
2876 Take note of what happened to AMP swedelo-8/5/1998
2875 The Business Week article is a red herring. The options windfall was well knownBostonView-8/5/1998
2874 New acquisition! biz.yahoo.com Amazing! "buy-to-growth", that's P.M.Freedman-8/5/1998
2873 Incredible greed and stupid approval by shareholders. Must read article from BDaulat-8/5/1998
2872 >>can anyone explain the runup for today? it can't be just short covAlienTech-8/5/1998
2871 go back a few posts and see the contract ca won. blankmind-8/4/1998
2870 UpChuck Phillips wrote a report. here you go... Dow Jones News Service via DoThe Rancher-8/4/1998
2869 can anyone explain the runup for today? it can't be just short coveringreba kenith-8/4/1998
2868 Nice discussion of the revenue issue........ too bad the twins could not put iBox-By-The-Riviera™-8/4/1998
2867 Reba: Confirmed; 12th August, 1998 annual general meeting at 10 a.m. (From CA Irupert1-8/4/1998
2866 Reba; Just saw your question about meeting on the 8th. I saw that posted as trupert1-8/4/1998
2865news.comP.M.Freedman-8/4/1998
2864 crap....it's legitimate here to consider whether or not our domestic news dBox-By-The-Riviera™-8/3/1998
2863 Not to lend a shred of credibility to Pru, who in my unscientific and random reBostonView-8/3/1998
2862 you are correct on all accounts -- it's tough to tell if this will be a 2-3The Rancher-8/3/1998
2861 Rancher: Some excerpts from what analysts said about the issue, as well as a crupert1-8/3/1998
2860 Rancher: So, apart from the admittedly serious problem of client reluctance inrupert1-8/3/1998
2859 Thread: Please, please don't lets start the OT stuff on this thread, some orupert1-8/3/1998
2858 SOP 97-2 was designed to "insulate" software companies from customersThe Rancher-8/3/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News