Silicon Investor: What's Next? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Silicon Investor: What's Next?

An SI Board Since April 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
395	22	0

Emcee: BryanB	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
295	<i>>> If it's a choice between real-time searching and editing	David Lawrence	-	5/26/1999
294	The editing feature is one of the best things SI offers. I've often noticed	RTev	-	5/26/1999
293	Well it's been around since day one practically and folks are pretty use to	broken_cookie	-	5/26/1999
292	I agree with you. Corrections, additions and/or deletions to your post can be	Sarkie	-	5/26/1999
291	Why is it necessary to be able to edit posts for 15 min, especially with a prev	Albert Hurd	-	5/26/1999
290	You can edit posts for 15 minutes. They may be kept in one location (server cac	broken_cookie	-	5/26/1999
289	I have noticed that the searches are delayed by about 15 min. It would be very	Albert Hurd	-	5/26/1999
288	Thanks - again!!! ;-) Message 9757482	Josef Svejk	-	5/25/1999
287	A number of you have posted questions about the IQC acquisition relating to pri	BryanB	-	5/24/1999
286	Yes! :-)	Josef Svejk	-	5/23/1999
285	Are you talking to me?	peter michaelson	-	5/23/1999
284	twitoo.simplenet.com !!!	Josef Svejk	-	5/23/1999
283	Bryan: Here's an old idea that I think would be most interesting and valua	peter michaelson	-	5/23/1999
282	Of course you can always use a chart when looking at historical posts, but addi	Razorbak	-	5/23/1999
281	But the trees are what would be significant in such a stamping of price. If you	RTev	-	5/23/1999
280	Let's not miss the forest for the trees. From a big-picture context, that p	Razorbak	-	5/23/1999
279	But here's a problem with stamping price along with time: It would have to	RTev	-	5/22/1999
278	"retroactively adjust time-stamps for splits?" Good point!!! No SI	John J. Frawley	-	5/22/1999
277	Will SI be "expected" to retroactively adjust time-stamps for splits?	David Lawrence	-	5/22/1999
276	Another suggestion... How about 'price-stamping' all posting automatica	John J. Frawley	-	5/21/1999
275	I have a suggestion, get rid of the autofocus thing on the portfolio page. Wh	Ken D	-	5/20/1999
274	I'll be sure to let you know after I get it. :-D	David Lawrence	-	5/19/1999
273	Haven't been reading this thread, folks, but I am wondering, wondering, whe	George the Greek	-	5/19/1999
272	Humbly report, Bryan, I know that since you all have already been so nice and	Josef Svejk	-	5/19/1999
271	Well, the exchanges are going to demand their payment for real-time quotes, the	Richard Bunker	-	5/16/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):