SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Barrick Gold (ABX)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3558 49 0 ABX
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2983I could care less about the gold carry trade. If people have to deliver to uncorusset-5/21/2002
2982<b>They are only claiming the $365/ounce by assuming that the gold they borusset-5/21/2002
2981Sinclairs essay rests on two problems with hedging,... <b>So what is wronrusset-5/21/2002
2980Barrick is nothing like Enron. Your assertion they double count revenues or coorusset-5/21/2002
2979NO I am too smart to waste the time...the calculation is really what effect did nickel61-5/21/2002
2978It has nothing to do with the reserve calculations or the cost projections. It hnickel61-5/21/2002
2977Gold is currently trading at about $316, but Barrick is averaging $365 per oz onnickel61-5/21/2002
2976<b>18 million ounces sold short on the spot gold market over the last ten russet-5/21/2002
2975I can't believe this Nuckelhead continues to tell us he is smarter, more exprusset-5/21/2002
2974I guess you are once again making your idiotic assumption that Barricks reserve russet-5/21/2002
2973You should recognize this guy Enigma didn't you have an interest in Sutton Rnickel61-5/21/2002
2972Your professor in the ivory tower was the one that said to take a longer time perusset-5/21/2002
2971You are flipping out Enigma. Do you think I am two people or something? Get a grnickel61-5/21/2002
2970What bullshit you post? If you repeat a lie enough i guess you think the mud wiEnigma-5/21/2002
2969Frankly I agree. By $350 gold the loss on the off balance sheet hedges will be snickel61-5/21/2002
2968Logic, ah logic?Enigma-5/21/2002
2967If Ford's hedging programme can blow up, so can that Master of the Universe,The Barracudaâ„¢-5/21/2002
2966Time will resolve the issue over barrick. If the price of gold exceeds 350.00 aKen Benes-5/21/2002
2965Tuesday May 21, 1:28 PM Rising gold prices means less hedging-analysts SYDNEY, nickel61-5/21/2002
2964Why does the obvious significance of this have no impact on you? In a direct sennickel61-5/21/2002
2963<<We are all learning what is really going on with Barrick's financialEnigma-5/21/2002
2962In a direct sense they could not claim this high sale price if the gold wasn'nickel61-5/21/2002
2961Well frankly I appreciate your recognition of his credentials. The ivory tower onickel61-5/21/2002
2960OT 1) is it possible to use 2 aliases on SI at the same time? and 2) if one putsEnigma-5/21/2002
295918 million ounces sold short on the spot gold market over the last ten years hasnickel61-5/21/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):