SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silkroad
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
626 32 0
Emcee:  ahhaha Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
301 I mean 10 terabits/second, more than 10,000 OC-12 serial encapsulated channels ahhaha-3/9/1999
300 "The limit on throughput is the current fiber limit of say, 10 ter/sec.&qGeorge T. Santamaria-3/8/1999
299 The link: patents.ibm.com The next page in the patent deals with formulae whiahhaha-3/8/1999
298 The only conceivable upgrade would be to make the basic machinery more efficienahhaha-3/8/1999
297 Hmmm- This discussion brings to mind a great prof of physics I had who wrote anKachina-3/8/1999
296 I agree with you that this thread is extraordinary because of the qualities youFrank A. Coluccio-3/8/1999
295 e first couple of pages of the patent, or are you waiting for me to trip myGeorge T. Santamaria-3/8/1999
294 I see you've solved the patent diagram problem, where and how to post it. IFrank A. Coluccio-3/8/1999
293 Refering to Fig 1 and the discussion starting on page 2 on the link: patents.iahhaha-3/8/1999
292 >The Laguerre order story makes a nice color glossy annual report but I don&Frank A. Coluccio-3/7/1999
291 Maybe it is all possible to do all that 3 dimesional stacking of photons. WhatGeorge T. Santamaria-3/6/1999
290 <i>In QED, the angular momentum of a pure momentum state is explicitly *uahhaha-3/6/1999
289 **Mainly OT** It's been a good while since focusing on Schroedinger, but ISteveG-3/6/1999
288 Hello everyone, I am using this response as my first post to this thread. I havSrexley-3/5/1999
287 For completeness I include the patent's Background and summary: STABILIZEDahhaha-3/5/1999
286 I've just unpacked the patent pdf file. The drawings bring things into bettFrank A. Coluccio-3/5/1999
285 Note that in the preceding message I incorrectly used the term "repeater&qFrank A. Coluccio-3/5/1999
284 It appears to me that the Central Asia Research and Remediation Exchange is locFrank A. Coluccio-3/5/1999
283 FYI - This is the response from SDSU regardign Silkroad. It is highly encouragKachina-3/5/1999
282 >>It all looks like a possibility but whatever they are doing, they don&#Frank A. Coluccio-3/5/1999
281 This is the first installment of the patent. The numbers refer to the figures aahhaha-3/5/1999
280 ...However, what if we assume that the action of the modulator is to &#George T. Santamaria-3/4/1999
279 Can I ask that we convert our units to commn base? 500 RPS is 30,000 RPM. That&Kachina-3/4/1999
278 Good point. Carl had said that 10^6 rpm rotations were possible, but even at 50ahhaha-3/4/1999
277 I spent a number of years managing very large scale factory automation developmKachina-3/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):