SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Official Guide To GOOFS
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3539 23 0
Emcee:  Paul Weiss Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3014 TBGr, Actually DPMI and CYMI are complementary rather than competitive. To maSteve Wood-3/4/1998
3013 DPMI is the leading mask company, especially in the high end area. CYMI lasers jeffbas-3/3/1998
3012 Can I call ya Jeff? No? Okay, well Frank Lee-- Thanks for the alternative stockPaul Weiss-3/3/1998
3011 I think that DPMI is a better investment than CYMI, based on traditional investjeffbas-3/3/1998
3010 Steve-- I'm also waiting to see if another SEA note hurts the market as a wPaul Weiss-3/3/1998
3009 TGBr, With all the negative comments re: semi equips CYMI could be headed backSteve Wood-3/3/1998
3008 Well.... has my silence on CYMI gone on long enough to express how interesting Paul Weiss-3/2/1998
3007 Ok, gotta GOOFI for ya. I think it was mentioned a while back but seems to havSteve Wood-2/28/1998
3006 If you had tried to time the market at any of the scary, new highs during the lHonest Abe-2/27/1998
3005 Thanks for replying. My questions (or nonsense) are meant for any and all comerPaul Weiss-2/27/1998
3004 Paul... if this was addressed to me... <i>As a value player... does the bananawind-2/27/1998
3003 Can ya believe this? Four guys downgraded Fruit of The Loom today. Let's sePaul Weiss-2/27/1998
3002 Whoooooooeeeeee... The NKE story just keeps getting more interesting. As we disPaul Weiss-2/27/1998
3001 CNBC and FT are reporting on hostile takeover speculation regarding GLX and SBHHenry Niman-2/27/1998
3000 Ahem.. let's see if it works: ncf.carleton.caPaul Weiss-2/27/1998
2999 Not to take anything away from the analyst in question.... but the reason all tbananawind-2/24/1998
2998 Jim-- Not really off-topic, but a change of topic: Kudos (grudgingly) to a stocPaul Weiss-2/24/1998
2997 Paul... re: >Regarding RAWL: I know zilch. BUT... I am mildly curious. One obananawind-2/24/1998
2996 Jim-- Thanks for the response. I have respect for your logic, investment philosPaul Weiss-2/24/1998
2995 Well....understand that I am a value guy, have zero interest in what the stock bananawind-2/24/1998
2994 Jim-- Re:NKE. Nagging thought at the back of my mind-- this could be a valid GOPaul Weiss-2/24/1998
2993 I vote for blast. But then I love a good puff of smoke.epicure-2/21/1998
2992 GOOFIes (what's the plural of GOOFI?)-- Time for a vote? Do I blast Mr. StePaul Weiss-2/21/1998
2991 Here is a definite GOOFS. BUT they have a great new product with no competitioSteve-2/21/1998
2990 Thanks. I've seen it. -JLFbananawind-2/20/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):