SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Compuware (CPWR)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1627 27 0 CPWR
Emcee:  David M. Kaplan Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
302 Even with "strong buy" reiterations from Briefing.com and BancBoston Sean Long-2/8/1999
301 Hi, Noting that CPWR is tanking again, I am wondering where the next supporR. Ramesh-2/8/1999
300 BancBoston Robertson Stephens Reiterates Strong Buy on Compuware Corp. SAN FRASean Long-2/8/1999
299 From Briefing.com....Compuware Corp. (CPWR) 61 1/2 +1 1/2: CS First Boston reitPlatter-2/8/1999
298 <<Value Line's investment rankings>>Sean--1/29 issue was a 1 (SWilliam F. Wager, Jr.-2/8/1999
297 Does anyone on this board follow Value Line's investment rankings? If so, Sean Long-2/7/1999
296 It's just my guess. pass pass-2/7/1999
295 TA from MarketEdge for 2/8/99...it is not pretty as you said Toby.. Moving AveWilliam F. Wager, Jr.-2/7/1999
294 Re: Acquisition candidate BMCS in yr prev. post- Do you have any more info? DoRAYS-2/7/1999
293 check out EDS and SE. Maybe they're the reason for today's fall. pass pass-2/6/1999
292 There's precedent for this type of action. For instance, check a 2-year chToby Zidle-2/6/1999
291 What an ugly day for Compuware. I'm glad the stock didn't close below Sean Long-2/5/1999
290 I guess yesterday's relative strength was a one time event. I can't fiSean Long-2/5/1999
289 What's going on? Down 5+ now. pass pass-2/5/1999
288 <I am OK with TA, but don't tell me 49MA or 51MA would be less of an indToby Zidle-2/5/1999
287 Here's the CPWR 3month chart with 50/200MA (EMA to be exact, which is most Will Hou-2/4/1999
286 Hope your right...how's your double bottom now<ggg> William F. Wager, Jr.-2/4/1999
285 Nasdaq tumbles 82.87 points, or 3.3%, its third-largest-one-day point loss in hSean Long-2/4/1999
284 That's cuz Sean and I said it shall be so! <ggg> Message 7616400BI*RI-2/4/1999
283 Could be you're right about the minimal downward pressure. With the NASD CToby Zidle-2/4/1999
282 It's nice to finally see Compuware finally demonstrate some relative strengSean Long-2/4/1999
281 Sean: chartpattern.com there is another educational site for technical analysMaryinRed-2/4/1999
280 from the fundamental point of view, the only reason for downside pressure comespass pass-2/4/1999
279 Per my charting software, the 50-day moving average is $67 3/8. CPWR's cloToby Zidle-2/3/1999
278 <---If CPWR breaks $67 and closes above the 50-day moving average, we may thSean Long-2/3/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News