SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
GOPwinger Lie Debate Forum
An SI Board Since February 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
403 4 0
Emcee:  PartyTime Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
303I'm actually leaving for the night. You're free to go to whatever threaOriginal Mad Dog-3/4/2004
302Let's go over to Poet's thread: the Left Wing Porch. What say? "llaura_bush-3/4/2004
301Well, you could start an unmoderated or moderated thread to discuss my posts if Original Mad Dog-3/4/2004
300Well, great, OMD -- how magnanimous of you. -snicker- Where shall we have the olaura_bush-3/4/2004
299I'm willing to let readers be the judge of that, too.Original Mad Dog-3/4/2004
298LOL. Your pompous self-important "airs" are specifically hilarious. &laura_bush-3/4/2004
297I'm willing to let the readers of the threads be the judge of that. I'mOriginal Mad Dog-3/4/2004
296LMAO. You're hilarious, OMD. As a Bush Winger arbiter of "truth tellilaura_bush-3/4/2004
295<i>you owe your members an explanation, at the very least, as to why the &Original Mad Dog-3/4/2004
294Here's the current "thread header." Note the threats "warninlaura_bush-3/4/2004
293I was thinking <I>exactly</I> the same thing. You articulated it pePoet-3/4/2004
292As an "official representative" of management of this website with cenlaura_bush-3/4/2004
291So, you take utterly no responsibility for any thread here? What exactly is youlaura_bush-3/4/2004
290You assume too much. I don't pre-approve threads or messages.SI Dave-3/4/2004
289They aren't being libelled. That's ridiculous. People are expressing oOriginal Mad Dog-3/4/2004
288Oh, okay, SI Dave. I'll start a thread dedicated to bashing your Winger pallaura_bush-3/4/2004
287<i>>>You have no problems with that sick behavior?</i> That&#SI Dave-3/4/2004
286<i>>>Isn't it against the TOU to set up a moderated thread speciSI Dave-3/4/2004
285The thread is unique on all of SI in that it was established solely and specifialaura_bush-3/4/2004
284I disagree. Communities of free people are free to disagree. If American SpiriOriginal Mad Dog-3/4/2004
283Here's something worthy of debate. Too bad it wasn't posted in an open Poet-3/4/2004
282People power versus corporate power in 2004. Kick the bums out.American Spirit-3/4/2004
281The point is that starting threads to ridicule individuals violates the "splaura_bush-3/4/2004
280I don't know why you are banned since I am not the moderator of that thread.Original Mad Dog-3/4/2004
279She <b>IS NOT</b> banned. Nor is AS.Lazarus_Long-3/4/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News