SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
P&S and STO Death Blow's
An SI Board Since May 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
30712 215 0
Emcee:  Jeff Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
30362But it was an up day with the A/D line looking very good..Rich1-7/11/2003
30361Well, the NDX volume was really nothing much to speak of today.ajtj99-7/11/2003
30360Cause we are still in a confirmed rally IMHO.. Look at this...speaks volumes AdvRich1-7/11/2003
30359Wow, how can you be so sure? There was nothing today to that said one way or anajtj99-7/11/2003
30358amazing day.. Bulls back in charge....Rich1-7/11/2003
30357Well, that d-blow reversed. Whipsaw city <G>ajtj99-7/11/2003
30356Full stoch d-blow on the NDX 60-minute. First one since April 9th: stockchartsajtj99-7/11/2003
30355<i>Equities are grossly overvalued, IMO of course we have a top in bonds, t2-7/11/2003
30354<i>Stocks should resume to the upward move since bonds have done nothing oAugustWest-7/11/2003
30353t2, You may be right! And of course you may be wrong.<g> Today should be aLone Ranger-7/11/2003
30352Stocks should resume to the upward move since bonds have done nothing on any equt2-7/10/2003
30351Is this just the pullback to 1680s before move to 1800s or could something more JRI-7/10/2003
30350Bradley model had a turn 07/02 we had one on 07/01.. You need to realize we wereRich1-7/9/2003
30349Jeff, Glad you returned to clarify the status of the market. Nice picture of Pfreelyhovering-7/9/2003
30348I want to remember taht post.. the way I do it is respond, not taht I have anythJames F. Hopkins-7/8/2003
30347Message 19035173Jeff-7/8/2003
30346We in the midst of a big Short Squeeze! The results of of shorting (and anti-buyt2-7/8/2003
30345Possible AV on the weekly here. This could run to the top of the wedge before bjjstingray-7/8/2003
30344Rich, Where can I find info on the 'bradley'?freelyhovering-7/7/2003
30343I too suggested that 07/02 was a low and was told I was nuts.. investorshub.comRich1-7/7/2003
30342The Bradley watchers are cutting it a bit close. It has been quite useful over tJoe Smith-7/7/2003
30341this up was about 10pts stronger than even i expected for this phase.... so thaJeff-7/7/2003
30340well...i would have posted more but i can't stand all the negative vibes on Jeff-7/7/2003
30339Bingo! FredFrederick Langford-7/7/2003
30338Let me also express my thanks for your work here. You certainly could have keptDD™-7/7/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):