SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intermagnetics (IMG)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3448 16 0 IMG
Emcee:  Gregg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3073 Mark, The fact remains that if you believe there is a future for superconductivWafa SHIHABI-5/9/1999
3072 I've decided those comments on the Yahoo board are entertainment and entertMark Shaw-5/8/1999
3071 If you like IMG, it would seem that technically, this is a good point to enter.Tom Linzmeier-5/8/1999
3070 Yes, yes, yes. )))) Wafa SHIHABI-5/5/1999
3069 AMSC looks like it's making a move as well. This lends further credibilityMark Shaw-5/5/1999
3068 The Soros connection to superconductivity that you mentioned reminded me that hFrank Byers-5/4/1999
3067 > I'd have to chip in my opinion that some one is positioning the industWafa SHIHABI-5/2/1999
3066 Your theory sounds quite good, Tom. Something has to account for the increase Mark Shaw-5/1/1999
3065 Full Disclosure. I am a broker and I do have a position in IMG. Tom Tom Linzmeier-5/1/1999
3064 Two thoughts on the increased activity. First, it is very constant. In times Tom Linzmeier-5/1/1999
3063 True... I agree about fundamentals....and also that Volume has to be something Gerald Thomas-5/1/1999
3062 We still have not been able to figure out this increased volume. Last Summer anMark Shaw-4/30/1999
3061 hey , I wanted it to be true as much as you... I've been (or was ) in the Gerald Thomas-4/30/1999
3060 Sorry Gerald, don't much care either way. I just happened to follow up onP2V-4/30/1999
3059 IMG ought to contact INTEL...they have been testing KRYOTECH'S 30% solutioGerald Thomas-4/30/1999
3058 Good post, Gerald. I don't think the recent runup has anything to do with Mark Shaw-4/30/1999
3057 first of all Kryotech's tech is -40 degrees... I am assuming that you know Gerald Thomas-4/30/1999
3056 Super-G Q&A doc from AMD's Shareholders meeting ** (From this link, clP2V-4/30/1999
3055 I don't mean to put water on the fire... But if you go into the website ..Gerald Thomas-4/30/1999
3054 KryoTech Demonstrates Gigahertz Computer KryoTech Super-G™ based on thermallyWafa SHIHABI-4/30/1999
3053 Joint AMD, IMG product by Kyrotech kryotech.comP2V-4/29/1999
3052 I agree, Steve. As previous posts point out, no one is more frustrated with thMark Shaw-4/26/1999
3051 I almost sold some of my position off today, but after a while, I said the hellSteve in Vegas-4/26/1999
3050 I would rate my technical skills even lower than you rate yourself, Paul. I'Mark Shaw-4/24/1999
3049 Mark, or anyone else who would care to respond- I'd describe my technical aPaul Weiss-4/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):