SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Bring Back SI Bob!
An SI Board Since February 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
808 25 0
Emcee:  Ilaine Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
308Gotta run to my little girl's birthday party, but so nice to know you'reswisstrader-2/7/2001
307The CSCO thread had degenerated into nothing more than a dozen people chucking sBicycle-2/7/2001
306Yup, I remember that speech too...meaningless then, meaningless now...the man reswisstrader-2/7/2001
305Since when is admin not part of back office operations?swisstrader-2/7/2001
304When someone who was conservative was suspended, they said SI was prejudiced agaIlaine-2/7/2001
303Either you needed the grub or I seemed to have hit a raw nerve...in either case,swisstrader-2/7/2001
302No attack from me, just indicated that the man seems to have gotten caught up inswisstrader-2/7/2001
301Has anyone ever mentioned to you that you are an idiot?username-2/7/2001
300more robust functionality: "have never been parts of my job duties." swisstrader-2/7/2001
299Your message simply confirms what kind of person you are to those who might not username-2/7/2001
298<i>let alone input from users who are not so happy about a change in their(Bob) Zumbrunnen-2/7/2001
297So I guess this means we're allowed to tell you to GFY -g-MythMan-2/7/2001
296<i>more than he was working on bug fixes or more robust functionality</(Bob) Zumbrunnen-2/7/2001
295:)Carolyn-2/7/2001
294Whatever you do, we wanted you to know how we love you! *Smooooch!* -g-Ilaine-2/7/2001
293Yes, a few people agree with you.Ilaine-2/7/2001
292First, I'd like to thank each and every one of you who has posted on this th(Bob) Zumbrunnen-2/7/2001
291While this may be a community site as advertised by SI, you, nor I, nor anyone eswisstrader-2/7/2001
290Then again, looks like I have company...personally had a few back and forths witswisstrader-2/7/2001
289This is hardly a private matter between SI Management and Bob, given that 99% ofBernard Levy-2/7/2001
288From what I saw, the people questioning the actions of management were by and laIlaine-2/7/2001
287Oh, I think they are greatly outnumbered AND outweighed!Ilaine-2/7/2001
286The few seem to have opinions strong enough to make up for the rest of us, thougJon Tara-2/7/2001
285Just one man's view...I'm guessing that most folks with a negative view swisstrader-2/7/2001
284The interesting thing to me is how few people have expressed a negative opinion Ilaine-2/7/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News